Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

15‐year follow‐up of the Second Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma trial (MCL 2): prolonged remissions without survival plateau

Open access
Eskelund, Christian W., Kolstad, Arne, Jerkeman, Mats, Räty, Riikka, Laurell, Anna, Eloranta, Sandra, Smedby, Karin E., Husby, Simon, Pedersen, Lone B., Andersen, Niels S., Eriksson, Mikael, Kimby, Eva, Bentzen, Hans, Kuittinen, Outi, Lauritzsen, Grete F., Nilsson‐Ehle, Herman, Ralfkiær, Elisabeth, Ehinger, Mats, Sundström, Christer, Delabie, Jan, Karjalainen‐Lindsberg, Marja‐Liisa, Workman, Christopher T., Garde, Christian, Elonen, Erkki, Brown, Peter, Grønbæk, Kirsten, Geisler, Christian H.·2016·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary: In recent decades, the prognosis of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) has been significantly improved by intensified first‐line regimens containing cytarabine, rituximab and consolidation with high‐dose‐therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. One such strategy is the Nordic MCL 2 regimen, developed by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. We here present the 15‐year updated results of the Nordic MCL 2 study after a median follow‐up of 11·4 years: For all patients on an intent‐to‐treat basis, the median overall and progression‐free survival was 12·7 and 8·5 years, respectively. The MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI), biological MIPI, including Ki67 expression (MIPI‐B) and the MIPI‐B including mIR‐18b expression (MIPI‐B‐miR), in particular, significantly divided patients into distinct risk groups. Despite very long response durations of the low and intermediate risk groups, we observed a continuous pattern of relapse and the survival curves never reached a plateau. In conclusion, despite half of the patients being still alive and 40% in first remission after more than 12 years, we still see an excess disease‐related mortality, even among patients experiencing long remissions. Even though we consider the Nordic regimen as a very good choice of regimen, we recommend inclusion in prospective studies to explore the benefit of novel agents in the frontline treatment of MCL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjh.14241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Eskelund, C. W., Kolstad, A., Jerkeman, M., Räty, R., Laurell, A., Eloranta, S., Smedby, K. E., Husby, S., Pedersen, L. B., Andersen, N. S., Eriksson, M., Kimby, E., Bentzen, H., Kuittinen, O., Lauritzsen, G. F., Nilsson‐Ehle, H., Ralfkiær, E., Ehinger, M., Sundström, C., Delabie, J., Karjalainen‐Lindsberg, M., Workman, C. T., Garde, C., Elonen, E., Brown, P., Grønbæk, K., & Geisler, C. H.
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-05
Volume
175
Issue
3
Pages
410-418
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W2470400696
Cited by
217
References
2
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 15‐year follow‐up of the Second Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma trial (MCL 2): prolonged remissions without survival plateau. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjh.14241
The paper
Eskelund, C. W., Kolstad, A., Jerkeman, M., Räty, R., Laurell, A., Eloranta, S., Smedby, K. E., Husby, S., Pedersen, L. B., Andersen, N. S., Eriksson, M., Kimby, E., Bentzen, H., Kuittinen, O., Lauritzsen, G. F., Nilsson‐Ehle, H., Ralfkiær, E., Ehinger, M., Sundström, C., . . . Geisler, C. H. (2016). 15‐year follow‐up of the Second Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma trial (MCL 2): prolonged remissions without survival plateau. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.