Cited by 6Uterine Myomas and TreatmentsReproductive Health and ContraceptionGynecological conditions and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.

Husereau·2022·BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

There is substantial variation in outcomes reported in uterine fibroid randomised controlled trials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjo.v129.3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Husereau
Venue
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02
Volume
129
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W4226235996
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 5 · 2022: 1
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
uterine fibroids, leiomyoma, randomized controlled trials, outcome heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review