The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Doing research inclusively: bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research
Abstract
Accessible summary: This article is about the ways people do research together. We talked with people doing inclusive research about their views and experiences. We found out about different ways people work together and how power is important. People talked about how inclusive research can change people's lives. We discuss why we think research can be performed inclusively in a variety of ways and why keeping this variety is important. Summary: This article reports on a study of how people do research that matters to people with learning disabilities and that involves them and their views and experiences. The study was an attempt to bring together people doing inclusive research so that, collectively, we could take stock of our practices. This would add to the individual reports and reflections on approaches that are already available. In particular, we wanted to explore what quality means in inclusive research and how we might best achieve this. We used focus groups to share and generate knowledge, and we recorded, transcribed and analysed the dialogue, looking for themes and answers to core questions. We found that there are many different ways of doing research inclusively, and we propose a model to describe this. Reflecting on the findings, we argue that it is important to keep a flexible vision of inclusive research and to keep learning and talking together.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research?: Thinking through `participatory methods'
Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568208091672 · Cited by 685
Cited by
Russell, G., Mandy, W., Elliott, D., White, R., Pittwood, T., & Ford, T. (2019) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-019-0260-x · Cited by 366
The added value of inclusive research
Walmsley, J., Strnadová, I., & Johnson, K. (2018) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.12431 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Nind, M., & Vinha, H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-109
- ISSN
- 0261-9997 (ISSN-L)
- 1354-4187
- 1468-3156
- OpenAlex
- W1995123584
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing research inclusively: bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bld.12013
- The paper
- Nind, M., & Vinha, H. (2014). Doing research inclusively: bridges to multiple possibilities in inclusive research. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.