The phylogenetic origin and evolution of acellular bone in teleost fishes: insights into osteocyte function in bone metabolism
Open accessAbstract
Vertebrate bone is composed of three main cell types: osteoblasts, osteoclasts and osteocytes, the latter being by far the most numerous. Osteocytes are thought to play a fundamental role in bone physiology and homeostasis, however they are entirely absent in most extant species of teleosts, a group that comprises the vast majority of bony ‘fishes’, and approximately half of vertebrates. Understanding how this acellular (anosteocytic) bone appeared and was maintained in such an important vertebrate group has important implications for our understanding of the function and evolution of osteocytes. Nevertheless, although it is clear that cellular bone is ancestral for teleosts, it has not been clear in which specific subgroup the osteocytes were lost. This review aims to clarify the phylogenetic distribution of cellular and acellular bone in teleosts, to identify its precise origin, reversals to cellularity, and their implications. We surveyed the bone type for more than 600 fossil and extant ray‐finned fish species and optimised the results on recent large‐scale molecular phylogenetic trees, estimating ancestral states. We find that acellular bone is a probable synapomorphy of Euteleostei, a group uniting approximately two‐thirds of teleost species. We also confirm homoplasy in these traits: acellular bone occurs in some non‐euteleosts (although rarely), and cellular bone was reacquired several times independently within euteleosts, in salmons and relatives, tunas and the opah (Lampris sp.). The occurrence of peculiar ecological (e.g. anadromous migration) and physiological (e.g. red‐muscle endothermy) strategies in these lineages might explain the reacquisition of osteocytes. Our review supports that the main contribution of osteocytes in teleost bone is to mineral homeostasis (via osteocytic osteolysis) and not to strain detection or bone remodelling, helping to clarify their role in bone physiology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 189 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Davesne, D., Meunier, F. J., Schmitt, A. D., Friedman, M., Otero, O., & Benson, R. B. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davesne, Donald
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-28
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1338-1363
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2909860944
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 189
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wolfson College, University of Oxford
- Leverhulme Trust (RPG‐2016‐168)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- osteocytes, acellular bone, teleosts, ancestral state reconstruction, homoplasy, osteolysis, bone mineral homeostasis, anadromous migration, salmonids, tuna, opah, bone physiology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone and Bones, Biological Evolution, Fishes, Osteocytes, Phylogeny, Bone Remodeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review