Cited by 227Global trade and economicsEconomic and Technological InnovationGlobal Trade and Competitiveness

Estimating the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies within structural gravity models

Open access
Heid, Benedikt, Larch, Mario, Yotov, Yoto V.·2021·Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique

Abstract

We propose a simple method to identify the effects of unilateral and non‐discriminatory trade policies on bilateral trade within a theoretically consistent empirical gravity model. Specifically, we argue that structural gravity estimations should be performed with data that include not only international trade flows but also intra‐national trade flows. The use of intra‐national sales allows identification of the effects of non‐discriminatory trade policies such as most favoured nation tariffs, even in the presence of exporter and importer fixed effects. A byproduct of our approach is that it can be used to recover estimates of the trade elasticity, a key parameter for quantitative trade models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our techniques in the case of most favoured nation tariffs and “time to export” as representative non‐discriminatory determinants of trade on the importer and on the exporter side, respectively. Our methods can be extended to quantify the impact on trade of any country‐specific characteristics as well as any non‐trade policies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/caje.12493

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using domestic trade flows for gravity estimations enables estimation of the effects of non-discriminatory trade policies.

    “Some of the benefits of using domestic trade flows for gravity estimations include the ability to estimate the effects of non-discriminatory trade policies (Heid et al., 2021) and country-specific trade policies (Beverelli et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Anderson, J.E. (2011) "The gravity model," Annual Review of Economics 3(1), 133-60
  2. Anderson, J.E., M. Larch, and Y. V. Yotov (2018) "GEPPML: General equilibrium analysis with PPML," World Economy 41(10), 2750-82
  3. Anderson, J.E., and D. Marcouiller (2002) "Insecurity and the pattern of trade: An empirical investigation," Review of Economics and Statistics 84(2), 342-52
  4. Anderson, J.E., and E. van Wincoop (2003) "Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle," American Economic Review 93(1), 170-92
  5. Anderson, J.E., M. Vesselovsky, and Y. V. Yotov (2016) "Gravity with scale effects," Journal of International Economics 100(May), 174-93
  6. Anderson, J.E., and Y. V. Yotov (2010) "The changing incidence of geography," American Economic Review 100(5), 2157-86 (2012) "Gold standard gravity," NBER working paper no. 17835
  7. Arkolakis, C., A. Costinot, and A. Rodríguez-Clare (2012) "New trade models, same old gains?," American Economic Review 102(1), 94-130
  8. Baier, S.L., and J. H. Bergstrand (2004) "Economic determinants of free trade agreements," Journal of International Economics 64(1), 29-63 (2007) "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics 71(1), 72-95
  9. Baltagi, B.H. (2013) Econometric Analysis of Panel Date, 5th ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley
  10. Bergstrand, J.H., M. Larch, and Y. V. Yotov (2015) "Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation," European Economic Review 78(August), 307-27
  11. Blanchard, E.J. (2009) "Trade taxes and international investment," Canadian Journal of Economics 42(3), 882-99
  12. Broda, C., J. Greenfield, and D. E. Weinstein (2006) "From groundnuts to globalization: A structural estimate of trade and growth," NBER working paper no. 12512 (2017) "From groundnuts to globalization: A structural estimate of trade and growth," Research in Economics 71(4), 759-83
  13. Broda, C., N. Limão, and D. E. Weinstein (2008) "Optimal tariffs and market power: The evidence," American Economic Review 98(5), 2032-65
  14. Cheng, I-H., and H. J. Wall (2005) "Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration," Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 87(1), 49-63
  15. Coşar, A.K., and B. Demir (2016) "Domestic road infrastructure and international trade: Evidence from Turkey," Journal of Development Economics 118(January), 232-44
  16. Coşar, A.K., and P. D. Fajgelbaum (2016) "Internal geography, international trade, and regional specialization," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8(1), 24-56
  17. Costinot, A., and A. Rodríguez-Clare (2014) "Trade theory with numbers: Quantifying the consequences of globalization." In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff, eds., Handbook of International Economics, vol. 4, pp. 197-261, Amsterdam: North-Holland
  18. Dai, M., Y. V. Yotov, and T. Zylkin (2014) "On the trade-diversion effects of free trade agreements," Economics Letters 122(2), 321-25
  19. de Sousa, J., T. Mayer, and S. Zignago (2012) "Market access in global and regional trade," Regional Science and Urban Economics 42(6), 1037-52
  20. Djankov, S., C. Freund, and C. S. Pham (2010) "Trading on time," Review of Economics and Statistics 92(1), 166-73
  21. Donaldson, D. (2018) "Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure," American Economic Review 108(4-5), 899-934
  22. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2002) "Technology, geography, and trade," Econometrica 70(5), 1741-79
  23. Egger, P., and M. Larch (2008) "Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships: An empirical analysis," Journal of International Economics 76(2), 384-99 (2012) "Tariff evasion effects in quantitative general equilibrium," Economics Letters 116(2), 262-64
  24. Egger, P., M. Larch, K. E. Staub, and R. Winkelmann (2011) "The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(3), 113-43
  25. Egger, P., and F. Tarlea (2015) "Multi-way clustering estimation of standard errors in gravity models," Economics Letters 134(C), 144-47
  26. Fally, T. (2015) "Structural gravity and fixed effects," Journal of International Economics 97(1), 76-85
  27. Felbermayr, G., B. Jung, and M. Larch (2015) "The welfare consequences of import tariffs: A quantitative perspective," Journal of International Economics 97(2), 295-309
  28. Fernández-Val, I., and M. Weidner (2016) "Individual and time effects in nonlinear panel models with large N, T," Journal of Econometrics 192(1), 291-312 (2018) "Fixed effects estimation of large-T panel data models," Annual Review of Economics 10, 109-38
  29. Fieler, A.C. (2011) "Non-homotheticity and bilateral trade: Evidence and a quantitative explanation," Econometrica 79(4), 1069-101
  30. Gurevich, T., and P. Herman (2018) "The Dynamic Gravity Dataset 1948-2016," Office of Economics working paper no. 2018-02-A Head, K., and T. Mayer (2014) "Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook." In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff, eds., Handbook of International Economics, vol. 4, pp. 131-90. Amsterdam: North-Holland
  31. Head, K., and J. Ries (2008) "FDI as an outcome of the market for corporate control: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Economics 74(1), 2-20
  32. Heid, B., and M. Larch (2016) "Gravity with unemployment," Journal of International Economics 101(July), 70-85
  33. Imbens, G.W., and J. M. Wooldridge (2009) "Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature 47(1), 5-86
  34. Imbs, J., and I. Mejean (2015) "Elasticity optimism," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7(3), 43-83 (2017) "Trade elasticities," Review of International Economics 25(2), 383-402
  35. Kee, H.L., A. Nicita, and M. Olarreaga (2004) "Estimating import demand and export supply elasticities," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings, no. 368. Washington: The World Bank (2008) "Import demand elasticities and trade distortions," Review of Economics and Statistics 90(4), 666-82
  36. Larch, M., J. Wanner, and Y. V. Yotov (2019) "Currency unions and trade: A PPML re-assessment with high-dimensional fixed effects," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 81(3), 487-510
  37. Lerner, A.P. (1936) "The symmetry between import and export taxes," Economica 3(11), 306-13
  38. Martinez-Zarzoso, I., and L. Márquez-Ramos (2008) "The effect of trade facilitation on sectoral trade," B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy Topics 8(1), article 42
  39. Nicita, A., M. Olarreaga, and P. Silva (2018) "Cooperation in WTO's tariff waters?," Journal of Political Economy 126(3), 1302-38
  40. Ramondo, N., A. Rodríguez, and M. Saborío-Rodríguez (2016) "Trade, domestic frictions, and scale effects," American Economic Review 106(10), 3159-84
  41. Rauch, J.E., and V. Trindade (2002) "Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade," Review of Economics and Statistics 84(1), 116-30
  42. Santos Silva, J.M., and S. Tenreyro (2006) "The log of gravity," Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4), 641-58
  43. Sellner, R. (2019) "Non-discriminatory trade policies in panel structural gravity models: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations," Review of International Economics 27(3), 854-87
  44. Simonovska, I., and M. E. Waugh (2014) "The elasticity of trade: Estimates and evidence," Journal of International Economics 92(1), 34-50
  45. Subramanian, A., and S. J. Wei (2007) "The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly," Journal of International Economics 71(3), 151-75
  46. Timmer, M.P., E. Dietzenbacher, B. Los, R. Stehrer, and G. J. de Vries (2015) "An illustrated user guide to the World Input-Output Database: The case of global automotive production," Review of International Economics 23(3), 575-605
  47. Tokarick, S. (2014) "A method for calculating export supply and import demand elasticities," Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 23(7), 1059-87
  48. Trefler, D. (1993) "Trade liberalization and the theory of endogenous protection: An econometric study of U.S. import policy," Journal of Political Economy 101(1), 138-60
  49. Van den Bossche, P., and D. Prévost (2016) Essentials of WTO Law. New York: Cambridge University Press
  50. Waugh, M.E. (2010) "International trade and income differences," American Economic Review 100(5), 2093-124
  51. Wilson, J.S., C. L. Mann, and T. Otsuki (2005) "Assessing the potential benefit of trade facilitation: A global perspective," World Economy 28(6), 841-71
  52. Yotov, Y.V. (2012) "A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade," Economics Letters 117(3), 794-98

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heid, B., Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (FR)
  • Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Larch, Mario
Venue
Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
376-409
ISSN
  • 0008-4085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5982
OpenAlex
W3121172052
Cited by
227
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
FWCI
47.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Australian Research Council (DP190103524)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
Keywords
structural gravity model, most favoured nation tariffs, bilateral trade, trade elasticity, unilateral trade policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review