The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies
Abstract
Across multiple societies, we see a shift from regimes of truth (ROT) to “regimes of posttruth” (ROPT) characterized by proliferating “truth markets.” ROT corresponded to disciplinary society, tighter functioning between media/political/education apparatuses, scientific discourses, and dominant truth-arbiters. ROPT corresponds to societies of control, where power exploits new “freedoms” to participate/produce/express (as well as consume/diffuse/evaluate). These developments further correspond to postpolitics/postdemocracy, where issues, discourses, and agency for sociopolitical change remain constrained, despite the enabling of a new range of cultural and pseudopolitical participation around, among other things, truth. ROPT emerge out of postpolitical/postdemocratic strategies common to control societies where especially resource rich political actors attempt to use data-analytic knowledge to manage the field of appearance and participation, via attention and affect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-3110 · Cited by 2,458
(2013) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 947
Rancière, J., Panagia, D., & Bowlby, R. (2001) · Theory & Event · doi:10.1353/tae.2001.0028 · Cited by 715
Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know
Andrejevic, M. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9780203075319 · Cited by 499
Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of Drive
Dean, J. (2010) · Cited by 483
Taking care of youth and the generations
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-0349 · Cited by 396
Beer, D. (2013) · doi:10.1057/9781137270061 · Cited by 190
Popular culture and new media: the politics of circulation
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-5877 · Cited by 105
News Parody in Global Perspective: Politics, Power, and Resistance
Baym, G., & Jones, J. P. (2012) · Popular Communication · doi:10.1080/15405702.2012.638566 · Cited by 100
The Rumour Bomb: Theorising the Convergence of New and Old Trends in Mediated US Politics
Harsin, J. (2006) · Southern Review: Communication, Politics & Culture · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Cited by
Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095 · Cited by 227
“In general, this term connotes that previously familiar mechanisms of knowledge production with certain responsible actors and institutions (e.g., science, politics, and legacy media) on the one hand, and corresponding publics on the other, are fundamentally challenged (Gibson, 2018; Harsin, 2015).”
BackgroundKirk, H. R., Vidgen, B., Röttger, P., & Hale, S. A. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00820-y · Cited by 122
The Internet Archive and the socio-technical construction of historical facts
Ben-David, A., & Amram, A. (2018) · Internet Histories · doi:10.1080/24701475.2018.1455412 · Cited by 60
Fact-checking on Twitter: An analysis of the hashtag #StopBulos
Lobato, R. M., Velandia Morales, A., Sánchez Rodríguez, Á., Montoya Lozano, M., & García Sánchez, E. (2021) · Revista Interamericana de Psicología/Interamerican Journal of Psychology · doi:10.30849/ripijp.v55i2.1371 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Harsin, J.
- Venue
- Communication, Culture & Critique
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-333
- ISSN
- 1753-9129 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1549901758
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 53.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cccr.12097
- The paper
- Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of Posttruth, Postpolitics, and Attention Economies. Communication, Culture & Critique. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
