The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toddlers’ Word Learning From Contingent and Noncontingent Video on Touch Screens
Abstract
Researchers examined whether contingent experience using a touch screen increased toddlers’ ability to learn a word from video. One hundred and sixteen children (24–36 months) watched an on-screen actress label an object: (a) without interacting, (b) with instructions to touch anywhere on the screen, or (c) with instructions to touch a specific spot (location of labeled object). The youngest children learned from contingent video in the absence of reciprocal interactions with a live social partner, but only when contingent video required specific responses that emphasized important information on the screen. Conversely, this condition appeared to disrupt learning by slightly older children who were otherwise able to learn words by passively viewing noninteractive video. Results are interpreted with respect to selective attention and encoding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transfer of learning between 2D and 3D sources during infancy: Informing theory and practice
Barr, R. (2010) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.001 · Cited by 294
Cited by
Children and Adolescents and Digital Media
Reid Chassiakos, Y. (., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., Cross, C., COUNCIL ON COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA, Hill, D., Ameenuddin, N., Hutchinson, J., Levine, A., et al. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2593 · Cited by 1,340
Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test
Madigan, S., Browne, D., Racine, N., Mori, C., & Tough, S. (2019) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056 · Cited by 734
Radesky, J. S., & Christakis, D. A. (2016) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2016.06.006 · Cited by 364
Digital screen media and cognitive development
Anderson, D. R., Subrahmanyam, K., & Workgroup, O. B. O. T. C. I. O. D. M. (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758c · Cited by 273
Growing up in the digital age: Early learning and family media ecology
Barr, R. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419838245 · Cited by 147
Advertising in Young Children’s Apps: A Content Analysis
Meyer, M., Adkins, V., Yuan, N., Weeks, H. M., Chang, Y.-J., & Radesky, J. (2019) · Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000622 · Cited by 109
McArthur, B. A., Browne, D., Racine, N., Tough, S., & Madigan, S. (2022) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-021-00895-w · Cited by 26
Fletcher, K., Wright, C. A., Pesch, A., Abdurokhmonova, G., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2024) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2024.2356956 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., & Pempek, T. A.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-03-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 405-413
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2306007265
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
