Cited by 7Memory Processes and InfluencesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The development of clustering in episodic memory: A cognitive-modeling approach

Open access
Horn, Sebastian S, Bayen, Ute J, Michalkiewicz, Martha·2021·Child Development

Abstract

Younger children’s free recall from episodic memory is typically less organized than recall by older children. To investigate if and how repeated learning opportunities help children use organizational strategies that improve recall, the authors analyzed category clustering across four study-test cycles. Seven-year-olds, 10-year-olds, and young adults (N = 150) studied categorically related words for a free-recall task. The cognitive processes underlying recall and clustering were measured with a multinomial model. The modeling revealed that developmental differences emerged particularly in the rate of learning to encode words as categorical clusters. The learning curves showed a common pattern across age groups, indicating developmental invariance. Memory for individual items also contributed to developmental differences and was the only factor driving 7-year-olds’ moderate improvements in recall.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.13407

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young children are less able to employ effective (complex) encoding strategies when they are not explicitly or implicitly prompted to do so.

    “Equally, because young children are less able to employ effective (complex) encoding strategies when they are not explicitly or implicitly prompted to do so (Horn, Bayen, & Michalkiewicz, 2021; Schleepen & Jonkman, 2012; Schneider, 1986), there should be more opportunity for concurrent JOLs to refine their learning strategies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn, S. S., Bayen, U. J., & Michalkiewicz, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Horn, Sebastian S
  • Bayen, Ute J
Venue
Child Development
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
239-257
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W3083499025
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (100019-185463)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100019, 185463)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
episodic memory, free recall, category clustering, memory organization, developmental differences, children's memory, multinomial model, learning curve, word learning, encoding strategies
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review