Cited by 27Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Welfare and AdoptionSocial Work Education and Practice

Beyond co‐occurrence: Addressing the intersections of domestic violence, mental health and substance misuse

Open access
Humphreys, Cathy, Heward‐Belle, Susan, Tsantefski, Menka, Isobe, Jasmin, Healey, Lucy·2022·Child & Family Social Work

Abstract

This paper reports an Australian project designed to simultaneously explore and capacity build professional practice when working at the intersection of parental mental health and/or problematic substance use and domestic violence (DV). Data from this paper are derived from two main sources: observations and ethnographic notes obtained during 28 Community of Practice (CoP) meetings and semi‐structured interviews with 28 CoP participants. Participants were front‐line workers from a range of government and non‐government organizations providing services to families experiencing DV across three Australian states who participated in The STACY Project: Safe and Together Addressing ComplexitY. Thematic analysis was employed to examine the research questions: How do professionals and organizations understand and respond to families experiencing DV, parental mental health difficulties and problematic substance use issues? How did practitioners report participation in the STACY Project reorienting professional practice with families experiencing DV, parental mental health difficulties, and substance misuse issues? This paper reports workers' exploration of practice implications. The research found that ‘domestic violence blind’ practice has become entrenched at the intersections of child protection, substance misuse and mental health problems, but a shared framework could bring practitioners from diverse sectors together to generate new ways of working with these complex problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cfs.12885

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Humphreys, C., Heward‐Belle, S., Tsantefski, M., Isobe, J., & Healey, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Sydney School of Education and Social Work University of Sydney Camperdown NSW Australia
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Humphreys, Cathy
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12-12
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
299-310
ISSN
  • 1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2206
OpenAlex
W4200130636
Cited by
27
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Department of Social Services, Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
Keywords
domestic violence, parental mental health, problematic substance use, intersectionality, communities of practice, professional practice, capacity building, child protection, frontline workers, intersectoral collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review