Cited by 43Congenital limb and hand anomaliesdental development and anomaliesDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Genetic regulatory pathways of split‐hand/foot malformation

Open access
Kantaputra, Piranit N., Carlson, Bruce M.·2019·Clinical Genetics

Abstract

Split‐hand/foot malformation (SHFM) is caused by mutations in TP63, DLX5, DLX6, FGF8, FGFR1, WNT10B, and BHLHA9. The clinical features of SHFM caused by mutations of these genes are not distinguishable. This implies that in normal situations these SHFM‐associated genes share an underlying regulatory pathway that is involved in the development of the central parts of the hands and feet. The mutations in SHFM‐related genes lead to dysregulation of Fgf8 in the central portion of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) and subsequently lead to misexpression of a number of downstream target genes, failure of stratification of the AER, and thus SHFM. Syndactyly of the remaining digits is most likely the effects of dysregulation of Fgf‐Bmp‐Msx signaling on apoptotic cell death. Loss of digit identity in SHFM is hypothesized to be the effects of misexpression of HOX genes, abnormal SHH gradient, or the loss of balance between GLI3A and GLI3R. Disruption of canonical and non‐canonical Wnt signaling is involved in the pathogenesis of SHFM. Whatever the causative genes of SHFM are, the mutations seem to lead to dysregulation of Fgf8 in AER cells of the central parts of the hands and feet and disruption of Wnt‐Bmp‐Fgf signaling pathways in AER.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cge.13434

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kantaputra, P. N., & Carlson, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kantaputra, Piranit N.
Venue
Clinical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
132-139
ISSN
  • 0009-9163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-0004
OpenAlex
W2887424427
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Thailand Research Fund (BRG 6180007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
split hand/foot malformation, FGF8, apical ectodermal ridge, syndactyly, digit identity, Hox genes, Gli3, Wnt signaling, p63, Dlx5, Dlx6, FGFR1, Wnt10b, apoptosis
MeSH terms
Foot Deformities, Congenital, Gene Expression Regulation, Hand Deformities, Congenital, Humans, Mutation, Syndactyly, Limb Deformities, Congenital, Homeodomain Proteins, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Fibroblast Growth Factor 8, Wnt Signaling Pathway

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review