SketchSoup: Exploratory Ideation Using Design Sketches
Open accessAbstract
A hallmark of early stage design is a number of quick‐and‐dirty sketches capturing design inspirations, model variations and alternate viewpoints of a visual concept. We present SketchSoup, a workflow that allows designers to explore the design space induced by such sketches. We take an unstructured collection of drawings as input, along with a small number of user‐provided correspondences as input. We register them using a multi‐image matching algorithm, and present them as a 2D interpolation space. By morphing sketches in this space, our approach produces plausible visualizations of shape and viewpoint variations despite the presence of sketch distortions that would prevent standard camera calibration and 3D reconstruction. In addition, our interpolated sketches can serve as inspiration for further drawings, which feed back into the design space as additional image inputs. SketchSoup thus fills a significant gap in the early ideation stage of conceptual design by allowing designers to make better informed choices before proceeding to more expensive 3D modelling and prototyping. From a technical standpoint, we describe an end‐to‐end system that judiciously combines and adapts various image processing techniques to the drawing domain—where the images are dominated not by colour, shading and texture, but by sketchy stroke contours.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GenAI leverages large data to provide a natural language interface for idea generation, promising to be a solution for designers to overcome issues of lack of originality.
“GenAI leverages large data to provide a natural language interface for idea generation, promising to be a solution for designers to overcome issues of lack of originality [40], applied in domains like fashion [34] and design sketching [5, 29].”
From Sketchar: Supporting Character Design and Illustration Prototyping Using Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 26
- Authors
- Arora, R., Darolia, I., Namboodiri, V. P., Singh, K., & Bousseau, A.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
- Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Arora, R.
- Darolia, I.
- Namboodiri, V. P.
- Singh, K.
- Bousseau, A.
- Venue
- Computer Graphics Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-14
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 302-312
- ISSN
- 0167-7055 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8659
- OpenAlex
- W2588255158
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Computer Graphics Forum (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
- Keywords
- design sketches, conceptual design, multi-image matching, viewpoint variation, shape variation, preliminary design, design space exploration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review