The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in Neural Rendering
Abstract
Synthesizing photo‐realistic images and videos is at the heart of computer graphics and has been the focus of decades of research. Traditionally, synthetic images of a scene are generated using rendering algorithms such as rasterization or ray tracing, which take specifically defined representations of geometry and material properties as input. Collectively, these inputs define the actual scene and what is rendered, and are referred to as the scene representation (where a scene consists of one or more objects). Example scene representations are triangle meshes with accompanied textures (e.g., created by an artist), point clouds (e.g., from a depth sensor), volumetric grids (e.g., from a CT scan), or implicit surface functions (e.g., truncated signed distance fields). The reconstruction of such a scene representation from observations using differentiable rendering losses is known as inverse graphics or inverse rendering. Neural rendering is closely related, and combines ideas from classical computer graphics and machine learning to create algorithms for synthesizing images from real‐world observations. Neural rendering is a leap forward towards the goal of synthesizing photo‐realistic image and video content. In recent years, we have seen immense progress in this field through hundreds of publications that show different ways to inject learnable components into the rendering pipeline. This state‐of‐the‐art report on advances in neural rendering focuses on methods that combine classical rendering principles with learned 3D scene representations, often now referred to as neural scene representations. A key advantage of these methods is that they are 3D‐consistent by design, enabling applications such as novel viewpoint synthesis of a captured scene. In addition to methods that handle static scenes, we cover neural scene representations for modeling non‐rigidly deforming objects and scene editing and composition. While most of these approaches are scene‐specific, we also discuss techniques that generalize across object classes and can be used for generative tasks. In addition to reviewing these state‐of‐the‐art methods, we provide an overview of fundamental concepts and definitions used in the current literature. We conclude with a discussion on open challenges and social implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
Johnson, J., Alahi, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_43 · Cited by 11,283
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
HornikK., StinchcombeM., & WhiteH. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.5555/70405.70408 · Cited by 9,081
Levoy, M., & Hanrahan, P. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237199 · Cited by 3,755
Loper, M., Mahmood, N., Romero, J., Pons-Moll, G., & J, B. M. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2816795.2818013 · Cited by 3,734 · cited 1×
“Their method uses conditioning by the parametric human shape model SMPL [LMR ∗ 15] as a shape proxy prior.”
MethodHuman3.6M: Large Scale Datasets and Predictive Methods for 3D Human Sensing in Natural Environments
Ionescu, C., Papava, D., Olaru, V., & Sminchisescu, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.248 · Cited by 3,653
Cited by
3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering
Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkuehler, T., & Drettakis, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3592433 · Cited by 6,025
“Recent neural rendering algorithms [Tewari et al. 2022] vastly reduce such artifacts and avoid the overwhelming cost of storing all input images on the GPU, outperforming these methods on most fronts.”
MethodPixelSplat: 3D Gaussian Splats from Image Pairs for Scalable Generalizable 3D Reconstruction
Charatan, D., Li, S. L., Tagliasacchi, A., & Sitzmann, V. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01840 · Cited by 420
Self-citationSajjadi, M. S. M., Meyer, H., Pot, E., Bergmann, U., Greff, K., Radwan, N., Vora, S., Lucic, M., Duckworth, D., Dosovitskiy, A., et al. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00613 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Tewari, A., Thies, J., Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P., Tretschk, E., Yifan, W., Lassner, C., Sitzmann, V., Martin‐Brualla, R., Lombardi, S., Simon, T., Theobalt, C., Nießner, M., Barron, J. T., Wetzstein, G., Zollhöfer, M., & Golyanik, V.
- Venue
- Computer Graphics Forum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 703-735
- ISSN
- 0167-7055 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8659
- OpenAlex
- W3214712237
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 213
- FWCI
- 41.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in Neural Rendering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cgf.14507
- The paper
- Tewari, A., Thies, J., Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P., Tretschk, E., Yifan, W., Lassner, C., Sitzmann, V., Martin‐Brualla, R., Lombardi, S., Simon, T., Theobalt, C., Nießner, M., Barron, J. T., Wetzstein, G., Zollhöfer, M., & Golyanik, V. (2022). Advances in Neural Rendering. Computer Graphics Forum. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.