Cited by 40Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCleft Lip and Palate Research

A systematic review of the surgical techniques for the treatment of internal nasal valve collapse: where do we stand?

Goudakos, J.K., Fishman, J.M., Patel, K.·2017·Clinical Otolaryngology

Abstract

Background A myriad of interventions have been described to address the restoration or preservation of the internal nasal valve, the narrowest portion of nasal airway. Objective of review To review systematically available knowledge and evidence about management options of the collapse of the internal nasal valve area. Type of review Systematic review. Search strategy A MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CENTRAL database search, followed by extensive hand searching for the identification of relevant studies. Evaluation method Review of all English-language studies addressing the treatment of the internal nasal valve collapse. Results Fifty-three studies were eventually identified and systematically reviewed. The majority (50 of 53) of the included articles are graded as level IV evidence and only one randomised trial was identified. The included randomised study reported no significant difference in improvement between the intervention group (autospreader flap) and placebo arms. The majority of the included studies presented in this systematic review provide level IV evidence concerning the optimal approach for cases of nasal valve collapse. Current research is driven more by reports of techniques than patient outcomes. Conclusions Proper evaluation and identification of the cause of the internal nasal valve collapse is paramount prior to selection of the preferred surgical solution. The three-dimensional construction of the nasal valve implies that many pathologies cannot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/coa.12664

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collapse of the nasal valve is a frequent and less well-known cause of nasal obstruction.

    “The collapse of the nasal valve, which leads to closure of the airway during inspiration, is a frequent and less well-known cause of NO [235,236].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [235]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goudakos, J. K., Fishman, J. M., & Patel, K.
Affiliations
St Mary's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Goudakos, J.K.
Venue
Clinical Otolaryngology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-19
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
60-70
ISSN
  • 0307-7772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4478
  • 1749-4486
OpenAlex
W2344533550
Cited by
40
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Keywords
nasal valve surgery, nasal obstruction, surgical technique, patient-reported outcomes, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Humans, Nasal Septum, Rhinoplasty, Nasal Obstruction, Nasal Cartilages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review