Longitudinal Analysis of Attitudes Toward Wolves
Abstract
Understanding individual attitudes and how these predict overt opposition to predator conservation or direct, covert action against predators will help to recover and maintain them. Studies of attitudes toward wild animals rely primarily on samples of individuals at a single time point. We examined longitudinal change in individuals’ attitudes toward gray wolves (Canis lupus). In the contiguous United States, amidst persistent controversy and opposition, abundances of gray wolves are at their highest in 60 years. We used mailed surveys to sample 1892 residents of Wisconsin in 2001 or 2004 and then resampled 656 of these individuals who resided in wolf range in 2009. Our study spanned a period of policy shifts and increasing wolf abundance. Over time, the 656 respondents increased agreement with statements reflecting fear of wolves, the belief that wolves compete with hunters for deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and inclination to poach a wolf. Endorsement of lethal control of wolves by the state and public hunting of wolves also increased. Neither the time span over which respondents reported exposure to wolves locally nor self‐reported losses of domestic animals to wolves correlated with changes in attitude. We predict future increases in legal and illegal killing of wolves that may reduce their abundance in Wisconsin unless interventions are implemented to improve attitudes and behavior toward wolves. To assess whether interventions change attitudes, longitudinal studies like ours are needed. Análisis Longitudinal de las Actitudes Hacia Lobos
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceptions of large carnivores can rapidly change as a function of population size.
“Similarly, perceptions of large carnivores, which often encompass both admiration and fear, can rapidly change as a function of population size (Zimmermann et al., 2001;Treves et al., 2013;Eriksson et al., 2015).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Treves et al., 2013
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth
Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J. S., Power, M. E., Berger, J., Bond, W. J., Carpenter, S. R., Essington, T. E., Holt, R. D., Jackson, J. B. C., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205106 · Cited by 4,087 · see citing works
Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote
Kellert, S. R. (1985) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(85)90047-3 · Cited by 315 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although previous researchers (Kellert 1985; Ericsson & Heberlein 2003) did not use the term tolerance, we used it to refer collectively to responses to our survey statements that were measures of beliefs, emotions, attitudes, and inclinations to act.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs
Williams, T. D., Kreling, S. E. S., Stanton, L. A., Wilkinson, C. E., Estien, C. O., Schell, C. J., & Carlen, E. J. (2024) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-024-00492-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Similarly, perceptions of large carnivores, which often encompass both admiration and fear, can rapidly change as a function of population size (Zimmermann et al., 2001; Treves et al., 2013; Eriksson et al., 2015).”
- Authors
- TREVES, A., NAUGHTON‐TREVES, L., & SHELLEY, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 315-323
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1767177626
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 17.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- U.S. Department of the Interior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- gray wolf, wolf, wolf conservation, human-wildlife conflict, attitude change over time, Wisconsin
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Wisconsin, Wolves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review