The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction
Open accessAbstract
A key measure of humanity's global impact is by how much it has increased species extinction rates. Familiar statements are that these are 100–1000 times pre‐human or background extinction levels. Estimating recent rates is straightforward, but establishing a background rate for comparison is not. Previous researchers chose an approximate benchmark of 1 extinction per million species per year (E/MSY). We explored disparate lines of evidence that suggest a substantially lower estimate. Fossil data yield direct estimates of extinction rates, but they are temporally coarse, mostly limited to marine hard‐bodied taxa, and generally involve genera not species. Based on these data, typical background loss is 0.01 genera per million genera per year. Molecular phylogenies are available for more taxa and ecosystems, but it is debated whether they can be used to estimate separately speciation and extinction rates. We selected data to address known concerns and used them to determine median extinction estimates from statistical distributions of probable values for terrestrial plants and animals. We then created simulations to explore effects of violating model assumptions. Finally, we compiled estimates of diversification—the difference between speciation and extinction rates for different taxa. Median estimates of extinction rates ranged from 0.023 to 0.135 E/MSY. Simulation results suggested over‐ and under‐estimation of extinction from individual phylogenies partially canceled each other out when large sets of phylogenies were analyzed. There was no evidence for recent and widespread pre‐human overall declines in diversity. This implies that average extinction rates are less than average diversification rates. Median diversification rates were 0.05–0.2 new species per million species per year. On the basis of these results, we concluded that typical rates of background extinction may be closer to 0.1 E/MSY. Thus, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than natural background rates of extinction and future rates are likely to be 10,000 times higher. Estimación de la Tasa Normal de Extinción de Especies
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 11,335
Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference
Schmid, R., Wilson, D. E., & Reeder, D. M. (1993) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1223169 · Cited by 5,386
Species diversity in space and time
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2720 · Cited by 4,573
Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09678 · Cited by 4,400
The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., & Sexton, J. O. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246752 · Cited by 3,542 · cited 2×
“More than the uncertainties about the extinctions themselves, the Conservation Biology Volume 29, No. 2, 2015 numbers reflected the wide range of estimates for how many eukaryote species there are (Pimm et al. 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L., & Brooks, T. M. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.269.5222.347 · Cited by 2,230
Self-citationWilson, D. (2005) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801882210 · Cited by 1,698
Post‐fire recovery of ant communities in Submediterranean Pinus nigra forests
Rodrigo, A., & Retana, J. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04272.x · Cited by 1,448
Hughes, C., & Eastwood, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601928103 · Cited by 1,086
Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R
FitzJohn, R. G. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00234.x · Cited by 941
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1093/aob/mcs196 · doi:10.1093/aob/mcs196
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1953.tb00138.x · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1953.tb00138.x
- 10.2307/1310807 · doi:10.2307/1310807
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96332.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96332.x · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr405 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr405
- 10.1038/423821a · doi:10.1038/423821a
Cited by
Dubayah, R., Blair, J. B., Goetz, S., Fatoyinbo, L., Hansen, M., Healey, S., Hofton, M., Hurtt, G., Kellner, J., Luthcke, S., et al. (2020) · Science of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002 · Cited by 1,042
The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation?
Cowie, R. H., Bouchet, P., & Fontaine, B. (2022) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12816 · Cited by 874
Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains
Jones, H. P., Holmes, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Tershy, B. R., Kappes, P. J., Corkery, I., Aguirre-Muñoz, A., Armstrong, D. P., Bonnaud, E., Burbidge, A. A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521179113 · Cited by 517
Extinction risk and threats to plants and fungi
Nic Lughadha, E., Bachman, S. P., Leão, T. C. C., Forest, F., Halley, J. M., Moat, J., Acedo, C., Bacon, K. L., Brewer, R. F. A., Gâteblé, G., et al. (2020) · PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10146 · Cited by 451
Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery
Humphreys, A. M., Govaerts, R., Ficinski, S. Z., Nic Lughadha, E., & Vorontsova, M. S. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0906-2 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- De Vos, J. M., Joppa, L. N., Gittleman, J. L., Stephens, P. R., & Pimm, S. L.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 452-462
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2114051274
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 22.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cobi.12380
- The paper
- De Vos, J. M., Joppa, L. N., Gittleman, J. L., Stephens, P. R., & Pimm, S. L. (2015). Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.