Threshold responses of Amazonian stream fishes to timing and extent of deforestation
Abstract
Deforestation is a primary driver of biodiversity change through habitat loss and fragmentation. Stream biodiversity may not respond to deforestation in a simple linear relationship. Rather, threshold responses to extent and timing of deforestation may occur. Identification of critical deforestation thresholds is needed for effective conservation and management. We tested for threshold responses of fish species and functional groups to degree of watershed and riparian zone deforestation and time since impact in 75 streams in the western Brazilian Amazon. We used remote sensing to assess deforestation from 1984 to 2011. Fish assemblages were sampled with seines and dip nets in a standardized manner. Fish species ( n = 84) were classified into 20 functional groups based on ecomorphological traits associated with habitat use, feeding, and locomotion. Threshold responses were quantified using threshold indicator taxa analysis. Negative threshold responses to deforestation were common and consistently occurred at very low levels of deforestation (<20%) and soon after impact (<10 years). Sensitive species were functionally unique and associated with complex habitats and structures of allochthonous origin found in forested watersheds. Positive threshold responses of species were less common and generally occurred at >70% deforestation and >10 years after impact. Findings were similar at the community level for both taxonomic and functional analyses. Because most negative threshold responses occurred at low levels of deforestation and soon after impact, even minimal change is expected to negatively affect biodiversity. Delayed positive threshold responses to extreme deforestation by a few species do not offset the loss of sensitive taxa and likely contribute to biotic homogenization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysis of species-level or functional-group responses allows for estimation of thresholds for major community shifts in response to environmental change.
“Analysis of species‐level or functional‐group responses allows for estimation of thresholds for major community shifts in response to environmental change (Baker & King, 2010; Brejão et al., 2017; Chen & Olden, 2020).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Brejão et al., 2017
Threshold responses have been observed in small Amazonian streams and in floodplain ecosystems in other regions.
“despite such thresholds being observed in small Amazonian streams (Brejão et al., 2017; Dala‐Corte et al., 2020; Martins et al., 2021) and in floodplain ecosystems in other regions (Chen & Olden, 2020; Filgueira et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Brejão et al., 2017
Indicator species displayed functional and taxonomic group response patterns, consistent with prior studies showing divergent fish responses to forest cover gradients in Amazonian rivers, floodplains, and streams.
“Indicator species displayed functional and taxonomic group response patterns, consistent with prior studies showing divergent fish responses to forest cover gradients in Amazonian rivers, floodplains, and streams (Arantes, Winemiller, Asher, et al., 2019; Brejão et al., 2017; Ilha et al., 2019; Lugo‐Carvajal et al., 2023).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Brejão et al., 2017
Some fishes respond to low levels of forest loss.
“Some fishes respond to low levels of forest loss (Brejão et al., 2017; Dala‐Corte et al., 2020; Martins et al., 2021).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Brejão et al., 2017
Cites
Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams
Bojsen, B. H., & Barriga, R. (2002) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00956.x · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dala‐Corte, R. B., Melo, A. S., Siqueira, T., Bini, L. M., Martins, R. T., Cunico, A. M., Pes, A. M., Magalhães, A. L. B., Godoy, B. S., Leal, C. G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13657 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationGrinstead, S., Arantes, C. C., Winemiller, K. O., Kelso‐Winemiller, L. C., de Oliveira, J. A., Petrere, M., & Freitas, C. E. C. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70110
- Authors
- Brejão, G. L., Hoeinghaus, D. J., Pérez‐Mayorga, M. A., Ferraz, S. F. B., & Casatti, L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
- University of North Texas (US)
- Department of Forest Sciences, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo Av. Pádua Dias, 11 Piracicaba SP Brazil
- Department of Zoology and Botany UNESP ‐ São Paulo State University 2265 Cristóvão Colombo Street, São José do Rio Preto SP 15054‐000 Brazil
- Corresponding author
- Brejão, Gabriel L.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-25
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 860-871
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2772909376
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2009/12318‐0, 2010/17494‐8, 2012/21916‐0, 2015/05827‐6)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Keywords
- deforestation, Amazonian streams, fish assemblages, threshold response, functional groups, ecomorphology, riparian zones, Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis, biotic homogenization, habitat loss
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Rivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review