Cited by 107Fish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Threshold responses of Amazonian stream fishes to timing and extent of deforestation

Brejão, Gabriel L., Hoeinghaus, David J., Pérez‐Mayorga, María Angélica, Ferraz, Silvio F. B., Casatti, Lilian·2018·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Deforestation is a primary driver of biodiversity change through habitat loss and fragmentation. Stream biodiversity may not respond to deforestation in a simple linear relationship. Rather, threshold responses to extent and timing of deforestation may occur. Identification of critical deforestation thresholds is needed for effective conservation and management. We tested for threshold responses of fish species and functional groups to degree of watershed and riparian zone deforestation and time since impact in 75 streams in the western Brazilian Amazon. We used remote sensing to assess deforestation from 1984 to 2011. Fish assemblages were sampled with seines and dip nets in a standardized manner. Fish species ( n = 84) were classified into 20 functional groups based on ecomorphological traits associated with habitat use, feeding, and locomotion. Threshold responses were quantified using threshold indicator taxa analysis. Negative threshold responses to deforestation were common and consistently occurred at very low levels of deforestation (<20%) and soon after impact (<10 years). Sensitive species were functionally unique and associated with complex habitats and structures of allochthonous origin found in forested watersheds. Positive threshold responses of species were less common and generally occurred at >70% deforestation and >10 years after impact. Findings were similar at the community level for both taxonomic and functional analyses. Because most negative threshold responses occurred at low levels of deforestation and soon after impact, even minimal change is expected to negatively affect biodiversity. Delayed positive threshold responses to extreme deforestation by a few species do not offset the loss of sensitive taxa and likely contribute to biotic homogenization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cobi.13061

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of species-level or functional-group responses allows for estimation of thresholds for major community shifts in response to environmental change.

    “Analysis of species‐level or functional‐group responses allows for estimation of thresholds for major community shifts in response to environmental change (Baker & King, 2010; Brejão et al., 2017; Chen & Olden, 2020).”
  • Threshold responses have been observed in small Amazonian streams and in floodplain ecosystems in other regions.

    “despite such thresholds being observed in small Amazonian streams (Brejão et al., 2017; Dala‐Corte et al., 2020; Martins et al., 2021) and in floodplain ecosystems in other regions (Chen & Olden, 2020; Filgueira et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2019).”
  • Indicator species displayed functional and taxonomic group response patterns, consistent with prior studies showing divergent fish responses to forest cover gradients in Amazonian rivers, floodplains, and streams.

    “Indicator species displayed functional and taxonomic group response patterns, consistent with prior studies showing divergent fish responses to forest cover gradients in Amazonian rivers, floodplains, and streams (Arantes, Winemiller, Asher, et al., 2019; Brejão et al., 2017; Ilha et al., 2019; Lugo‐Carvajal et al., 2023).”
  • Some fishes respond to low levels of forest loss.

    “Some fishes respond to low levels of forest loss (Brejão et al., 2017; Dala‐Corte et al., 2020; Martins et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brejão, G. L., Hoeinghaus, D. J., Pérez‐Mayorga, M. A., Ferraz, S. F. B., & Casatti, L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • Department of Forest Sciences, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture University of São Paulo Av. Pádua Dias, 11 Piracicaba SP Brazil
  • Department of Zoology and Botany UNESP ‐ São Paulo State University 2265 Cristóvão Colombo Street, São José do Rio Preto SP 15054‐000 Brazil
Corresponding author
Brejão, Gabriel L.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-25
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
860-871
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2772909376
Cited by
107
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2009/12318‐0, 2010/17494‐8, 2012/21916‐0, 2015/05827‐6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
deforestation, Amazonian streams, fish assemblages, threshold response, functional groups, ecomorphology, riparian zones, Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis, biotic homogenization, habitat loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review