Cited by 15Environmental Conservation and ManagementConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementMining and Resource Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mining threats in high‐level biodiversity conservation policies

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Amid a global infrastructure boom, there is increasing recognition of the ecological impacts of the extraction and consumption of construction minerals, mainly processed as concrete, including significant and expanding threats to global biodiversity. We investigated how high‐level national and international biodiversity conservation policies address mining threats, with a special focus on construction minerals. We conducted a review and quantified the degree to which threats from mining these minerals are addressed in biodiversity goals and targets under the 2011–2020 and post‐2020 biodiversity strategies, national biodiversity strategies and action plans, and the assessments of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Mining appeared rarely in national targets but more frequently in national strategies. Yet, in most countries, it was superficially addressed. Coverage of aggregates mining was greater than coverage of limestone mining. We outline 8 key components, tailored for a wide range of actors, to effectively mainstream biodiversity conservation into the extractive, infrastructure, and construction sectors. Actions include improving reporting and monitoring systems, enhancing the evidence base around mining impacts on biodiversity, and modifying the behavior of financial agents and businesses. Implementing these measures could pave the way for a more sustainable approach to construction mineral use and safeguard biodiversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cobi.14261

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. ACP‐EU, 2018, Baseline assessment of development minerals in Fiji
  2. Anderson D., 2004, Model selection and multi‐model inference
  3. 10.1038/srep14745 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/nph.12522 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.008 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/conl.12777 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.exis.2021.100904 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107233 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.exis.2017.03.008 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.018 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.exis.2020.12.005 · DOI
  12. 10.3390/resources4010025 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105707 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/d41586-022-01034-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108666 · DOI
  16. 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[733:LKOSAI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  17. 10.1139/er‐2022‐0118 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/ldr.1011 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.425 · DOI
  21. 10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.4 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5 · DOI
  23. European Bank of Reconstruction and Development. (2021).EBRD Annual Review 2020.www.ebrd.com/news/publications/annual‐report/annual‐review‐2020.html
  24. Gillieson D., 2022, Guidelines for Cave and Karst Protection
  25. 10.2979/ethicsenviro.23.2.05 · DOI
  26. Golev A. Gallagher L. Vander Velpen A. Lynggaard J. R. Friot D. Stringer M. Chuah S. Arbelaez‐Ruiz D. Mazzinghy D. Moura L. &Peduzzi P.(2022).Ore‐sand: A potential new solution to the mine tailings and global sand sustainability crises: Final report.The University of Queensland and The University of Geneva.https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:503a3fd · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41893-019-0225-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/cobi.13589 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ecs2.1624 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/cobi.13317 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/2688-8319.12089 · DOI
  32. Inter‐American Development Bank (IDB). (2021).Inter‐American Development Bank Annual Report 2020: The year in review.https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Inter‐American‐Development‐Bank‐Annual‐Report‐2020‐The‐Year‐in‐Review.pdf
  33. 10.1080/14615517.2012.705068 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/rra.3586 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100973 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/cobi.12882 · DOI
  37. 10.1073/pnas.1613773114 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005 · DOI
  39. 10.5751/ES-09830-220429 · DOI
  40. 10.31389/jied.76 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s10531-010-9973-z · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/d41586-023-04090-3 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/es402618m · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.001 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/conl.12848 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/icesjms/fsr039 · DOI
  48. R Core Team, 2021, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  49. Radzevičius R., 2010, Marine aggregate extraction regulation in EU member states, Journal of Coastal Research, 51, 15
  50. 10.11609/JoTT.o3734.5315-26 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/cobi.13252 · DOI
  52. 10.1111/rec.13160 · DOI
  53. Sanchez L. E., 2018, Guidebook of good environmental practices for the quarrying of limestone in karst areas
  54. 10.1111/conl.12694 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41893-022-00921-9 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/s10531-013-0472-x · DOI
  57. 10.1098/rspb.2018.1926 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.022 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8 · DOI
  60. Thaman R., 2013, Proceedings of the IGU Commission on Islands International Conference on Island Development: Local economy, culture, innovation and sustainability
  61. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00462.x · DOI
  62. 10.1126/science.aao0503 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1080/14615517.2022.2134619 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.011 · DOI
  65. Torres A. zu Ermgassen S. Ferri‐Yanez F. Navarro L. Rosa I. Teixeira F. Z. Wittkopp C. &Liu J.(2022).Unearthing the global impact of mining of construction minerals on biodiversity. bioRxiv.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.23.485272v1 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.016 · DOI
  67. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01630.x · DOI
  68. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102410 · DOI
  69. World Bank. (2017).The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework.https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/837721522762050108‐0290022018/original/ESFFramework.pdf#page=81&zoom=80 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/rec.13771 · DOI
  71. 10.1007/s13280‐021‐01557‐3 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/s41893-022-00857-0 · DOI
  73. 10.1111/conl.12664 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107562 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134798 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.019 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Torres, A., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Navarro, L. M., Ferri‐Yanez, F., Teixeira, F. Z., Wittkopp, C., Rosa, I. M. D., & Liu, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alicante (ES)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Departamento de Biología de la Conservación y Cambio Global Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Torres, Aurora
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
e14261-e14261
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W4393947562
Cited by
15
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (PNPD/CAPES, Finance Code 001)
  • HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (101106872, 846474)
  • Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana (CIDEIG/2022/44)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (LIFEWATCH‐2019‐09‐CSIC‐13)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/L002582/1)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101036849)
  • National Science Foundation (1924111, 2118329)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
Keywords
biodiversity policy, construction minerals, limestone mining, mining impacts on biodiversity, national biodiversity strategy, IPBES assessment, biodiversity mainstreaming, infrastructure development, concrete, extractive industries
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Mining, Biodiversity, Environmental Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review