The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mining threats in high‐level biodiversity conservation policies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Amid a global infrastructure boom, there is increasing recognition of the ecological impacts of the extraction and consumption of construction minerals, mainly processed as concrete, including significant and expanding threats to global biodiversity. We investigated how high‐level national and international biodiversity conservation policies address mining threats, with a special focus on construction minerals. We conducted a review and quantified the degree to which threats from mining these minerals are addressed in biodiversity goals and targets under the 2011–2020 and post‐2020 biodiversity strategies, national biodiversity strategies and action plans, and the assessments of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Mining appeared rarely in national targets but more frequently in national strategies. Yet, in most countries, it was superficially addressed. Coverage of aggregates mining was greater than coverage of limestone mining. We outline 8 key components, tailored for a wide range of actors, to effectively mainstream biodiversity conservation into the extractive, infrastructure, and construction sectors. Actions include improving reporting and monitoring systems, enhancing the evidence base around mining impacts on biodiversity, and modifying the behavior of financial agents and businesses. Implementing these measures could pave the way for a more sustainable approach to construction mineral use and safeguard biodiversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., et al. (2016) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · Cited by 18,423 · cited 1×
“…base would involve routine public reporting of monitoring outcomes aligned with the FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) principles (Wilkinson et al., 2016) and open practices (e.g., published in Conservation Evidence database, mobilizing data to GBIF; King et al., 2012).”
Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change
Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax3100 · Cited by 2,926 · cited 1×
“Recent assessments and resolutions stress the need to promote transitions to sustainable pathways, including for cities and infrastructure development (CBD, 2020; Díaz et al., 2019).”
Self-citationBending the Curve of Global Freshwater Biodiversity Loss: An Emergency Recovery Plan
Tickner, D., Opperman, J. J., Abell, R., Acreman, M., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Cooke, S. J., Dalton, J., Darwall, W., Edwards, G., et al. (2020) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa002 · Cited by 1,241 · cited 1×
“Likewise, reducing the overexploitation of aggregates is considered a top priority for slowing global freshwater biodiversity loss (Tickner et al., 2020).”
BackgroundJarić, I., Lennox, R. J., Kalinkat, G., Cvijanović, G., & Radinger, J. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14518 · Cited by 79
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- ACP‐EU, 2018, Baseline assessment of development minerals in Fiji
- Anderson D., 2004, Model selection and multi‐model inference
- 10.1038/srep14745 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.12522 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.008 · DOI
- 10.1111/conl.12777 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exis.2021.100904 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107233 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exis.2017.03.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exis.2020.12.005 · DOI
- 10.3390/resources4010025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105707 · DOI
- 10.1038/d41586-022-01034-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108666 · DOI
- 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[733:LKOSAI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1139/er‐2022‐0118 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/ldr.1011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.425 · DOI
- 10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-3010-5 · DOI
- European Bank of Reconstruction and Development. (2021).EBRD Annual Review 2020.www.ebrd.com/news/publications/annual‐report/annual‐review‐2020.html
- Gillieson D., 2022, Guidelines for Cave and Karst Protection
- 10.2979/ethicsenviro.23.2.05 · DOI
- Golev A. Gallagher L. Vander Velpen A. Lynggaard J. R. Friot D. Stringer M. Chuah S. Arbelaez‐Ruiz D. Mazzinghy D. Moura L. &Peduzzi P.(2022).Ore‐sand: A potential new solution to the mine tailings and global sand sustainability crises: Final report.The University of Queensland and The University of Geneva.https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:503a3fd · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-019-0225-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.13589 · DOI
- 10.1002/ecs2.1624 · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.13317 · DOI
- 10.1002/2688-8319.12089 · DOI
- Inter‐American Development Bank (IDB). (2021).Inter‐American Development Bank Annual Report 2020: The year in review.https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Inter‐American‐Development‐Bank‐Annual‐Report‐2020‐The‐Year‐in‐Review.pdf
- 10.1080/14615517.2012.705068 · DOI
- 10.1002/rra.3586 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100973 · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.12882 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1613773114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005 · DOI
- 10.5751/ES-09830-220429 · DOI
- 10.31389/jied.76 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10531-010-9973-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486 · DOI
- 10.1038/d41586-023-04090-3 · DOI
- 10.1021/es402618m · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/conl.12848 · DOI
- 10.1093/icesjms/fsr039 · DOI
- R Core Team, 2021, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
- Radzevičius R., 2010, Marine aggregate extraction regulation in EU member states, Journal of Coastal Research, 51, 15
- 10.11609/JoTT.o3734.5315-26 · DOI
- 10.1111/cobi.13252 · DOI
- 10.1111/rec.13160 · DOI
- Sanchez L. E., 2018, Guidebook of good environmental practices for the quarrying of limestone in karst areas
- 10.1111/conl.12694 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-022-00921-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10531-013-0472-x · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2018.1926 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.022 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8 · DOI
- Thaman R., 2013, Proceedings of the IGU Commission on Islands International Conference on Island Development: Local economy, culture, innovation and sustainability
- 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00462.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aao0503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14615517.2022.2134619 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.011 · DOI
- Torres A. zu Ermgassen S. Ferri‐Yanez F. Navarro L. Rosa I. Teixeira F. Z. Wittkopp C. &Liu J.(2022).Unearthing the global impact of mining of construction minerals on biodiversity. bioRxiv.https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.03.23.485272v1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01630.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102410 · DOI
- World Bank. (2017).The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework.https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/837721522762050108‐0290022018/original/ESFFramework.pdf#page=81&zoom=80 · DOI
- 10.1111/rec.13771 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13280‐021‐01557‐3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41893-022-00857-0 · DOI
- 10.1111/conl.12664 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107562 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134798 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.019 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Torres, A., zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E., Navarro, L. M., Ferri‐Yanez, F., Teixeira, F. Z., Wittkopp, C., Rosa, I. M. D., & Liu, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Alicante (ES)
- University of Kent (GB)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Departamento de Biología de la Conservación y Cambio Global Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD‐CSIC) Sevilla Spain
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
- Bangor University (GB)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Torres, Aurora
- ORCID
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-04-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e14261-e14261
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W4393947562
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (PNPD/CAPES, Finance Code 001)
- HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (101106872, 846474)
- Conselleria de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital, Generalitat Valenciana (CIDEIG/2022/44)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (LIFEWATCH‐2019‐09‐CSIC‐13)
- Natural Environment Research Council (NE/L002582/1)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101036849)
- National Science Foundation (1924111, 2118329)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
- Keywords
- biodiversity policy, construction minerals, limestone mining, mining impacts on biodiversity, national biodiversity strategy, IPBES assessment, biodiversity mainstreaming, infrastructure development, concrete, extractive industries
- MeSH terms
- Conservation of Natural Resources, Mining, Biodiversity, Environmental Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review