Cited by 1Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsDermatology and Skin Diseases

Marked Impact of Regulatory Bans on Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde‐Releaser‐Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study (1996–2024) From Turkey

Open access
Özkaya, Esen, Mangır, Ömer, Ayas, Elizaveta·2026·Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

Background: Formaldehyde (FA) and formaldehyde‐releasers (FRs) are well‐known causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Following the 2019 EU ban on FA and Quaternium‐15 in cosmetics, stable or slightly decreasing sensitisation rates have been reported. In Turkey, both were banned in 2021. Objectives: To assess FA/FR sensitisation and ACD rates before and after the ban, and evaluate the role of FA as a marker for FR allergy. Methods: A single‐centre retrospective cohort of 2592 patients patch tested with FA 1% or 2% aq. and at least one FR between 1996 and 2024. Results: FA/FRs sensitisation prevalence was 1.9% (48/2592), mostly in patients > 40 years old. The most frequent sensitisers were hexahydro‐1,3,5‐tris‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)triazine (0.7%) and Quaternium‐15 (0.6%). ACD occurred in 37.5% (18/48), mainly as hand eczema from non‐occupational rinse‐off cosmetics, while 16.7% were occupational (hairdressers/barbers/metalworkers). FA 1%–2% aq. failed to detect FR sensitisation in 31.9% ( n = 15/47) of patients, including nine missed with FA 1% aq. and six with FA 2% aq. No cases occurred after the 2021 ban. 2‐bromo‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol and DMDM‐hydantoin showed no co‐reactivity with FA, but were important inducers of FR‐related ACD. Conclusions: The 2021 ban in Turkey appears to have reduced ACD due to FA and FRs. Continued FR testing remains essential, as FA 2% aq. is complementary but not a fully reliable marker.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cod.70104

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Comission Regulation (EU) 2019/831 of May 22, 2019, 2019, Amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) no 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Cosmetic Products, Official Journal of the European Union, 23, 30
  2. Diepgen T. L., 1991, Kriterien zur Beurteilung der atopischen Hautdiathese, Dermatosen, 39, 79

Authors
Özkaya, E., Mangır, Ö., & Ayas, E.
Affiliations
Istanbul University (TR)
Corresponding author
Özkaya, Esen
Venue
Contact Dermatitis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-02-12
Volume
94
Issue
5
Pages
515-523
ISSN
  • 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0536
OpenAlex
W7128699899
Cited by
1
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
formaldehyde, formaldehyde releasers, allergic contact dermatitis, quaternium-15, patch testing, hand eczema, occupational dermatitis, hairdressers, Turkey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cosmetics, Female, Formaldehyde, Humans, Male, Methenamine, Middle Aged, Dermatitis, Occupational, Patch Tests, Retrospective Studies, Turkey, Prevalence, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review