The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Looking Inside the Black Box: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility
Abstract
Manuscript Type: Review Research Question/Issue: This study provides a systematic multi‐level review of recent literature to evaluate the impact of corporate governance mechanisms (CG) at the institutional, firm, group, and individual levels on firm level corporate social responsibility (CSR) outcomes. We offer critical reflections on the current state of this literature and provide concrete suggestions to guide future research. Research Findings/Insights: Focusing on peer‐reviewed articles from 2000 to 2015, the review compiles the evidence on offer pertaining to the most relevant CG mechanisms and their influence on CSR outcomes. At the institutional level, we focus on formal and informal institutional mechanisms, and at the firm level, we analyze the different types of firm owners. At the group level, we segregate our analysis into board structures, director social capital and resource networks, and directors' demographic diversity. At the individual level, our review covers CEOs' demography and socio‐psychological characteristics. We map the effect of these mechanisms on firms' CSR outcomes. Theoretical/Academic Implications: We recommend that greater scholarly attention needs to be accorded to disaggregating variables and yet comprehending how multiple configurations of CG mechanisms interact and combine to impact firms' CSR behavior. We suggest that CG‐CSR research should employ a multi‐theoretical lens and apply sophisticated qualitative and quantitative methods to enable a deeper and finer‐grained analysis of the CG systems and their influence on CSR. Finally, we call for cross‐cultural research to capture the context sensitivities typical of both CG and CSR constructs. Practitioner/Policy Implications: Our review suggests that for structural changes and reforms within firms to be successful, they need to be complemented by changes to the institutional makeup of the context in which firms function to encourage/induce substantive changes in corporate responsible behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–205 of 205
Decoupling Corporate Social Orientations: A Cross-National Analysis
Jain, T. (2015) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315610609 · Cited by 33
Self-citationCorporate Philanthropic Practices
Brown, W. O., & Helland, E. A. (2006) · Econstor (Econstor) · Cited by 29
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and CEO Luck: Are Lucky CEOs Socially Responsible?
Jiraporn, P., & Chintrakarn, P. (2013) · Applied Economics Letters · doi:10.1080/13504851.2013.772291 · Cited by 27
Compensating Outside Directors with Stock: The Impact on Non-Primary Stakeholders
Deutsch, Y., & Valente, M. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1447-7 · Cited by 24
Corporate governance reform: character‐building structures
Grant, P., & McGhee, P. (2014) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12043 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1452 · Cited by 864
Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA
Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Accounting Research · doi:10.1108/jaar-01-2017-0024 · Cited by 601
The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure
Jizi, M. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1943 · Cited by 593
Corporate Governance Meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Mapping the Interface
Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Jamali, D. (2022) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650320973415 · Cited by 414
Self-citationBoard Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Endrikat, J., de Villiers, C., Guenther, T. W., & Guenther, E. M. (2021) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650320930638 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, T., & Jamali, D.
- Venue
- Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-16
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-273
- ISSN
- 0964-8410 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8683
- OpenAlex
- W2176518417
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 205
- FWCI
- 46.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.