CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eating disorder symptomatology, body image, and mindfulness: Findings in a non‐clinical sample

Prowse, Emma, Bore, Miles, Dyer, Stella·2013·Clinical Psychologist
DOI 10.1111/cp.12008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BackgroundThere has been increasing interest in the use of mindfulness‐based interventions in treating various disorders and conditions; however, evidence to support the application of mindfulness‐based treatments for eating disorders is limited. The current study was designed as a preliminary investigation of the relationship between mindfulness and eating disorder symptoms to provide an avenue for further research and to inform treatment. Underlying factors, including body image, sense of self, identity, and quality of life, were also investigated in order to increase understanding about eating disorders.MethodA battery of self‐report questionnaires was administered online to first year psychology students from an Australian University (n = 411).Results“Observing” as a mindfulness skill was related to higher reported eating disorder symptoms; however, the mindfulness skills “acceptance without judgment” and “action with awareness” were associated with lower eating disorder symptoms.ConclusionsThese findings are consistent with theoretical support for a possible role of mindfulness‐based interventions in treating eating disorders.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cp.12008

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Erikson E. H., 1950, Childhood and society
  2. International Wellbeing Group, 2006, Personal Wellbeing Index
  3. Tangeny J. P., 2004, Journal of Personality, 72, 272

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Prowse, E., Bore, M., & Dyer, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Prowse, Emma
  • Bore, Miles
ORCID
Bore, Miles
Venue
Clinical Psychologist
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
77-87
ISSN
  • 1328-4207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9552
DOI
10.1111/cp.12008
OpenAlex
W1550058404
Cited by
42
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 792 d)
Locations
  • Clinical Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
eating disorder symptoms, mindfulness, body image, mindfulness-based interventions, observation, non-clinical sample, psychology students, self, identity, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review