The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of combined student‐ and parent‐based programs to prevent alcohol and other drug use among adolescents
Open accessAbstract
Issues.Alcohol and other drug use among adolescents is a serious concern, and effective prevention is critical. Research indicates that expanding school‐based prevention programs to include parenting components could increase prevention outcomes. This paper aims to identify and describe existing combined student‐ and parent‐based programs for the prevention of alcohol and other drug use to evaluate the efficacy of existing programs.Approach.The PsycINFO, Medline, Central Register of Controlled trials and Cochrane databases were searched in April 2015 and additional articles were obtained from reference lists. Studies were included if they evaluated a combined universal intervention for students (aged 11–18 years old) and their parents designed to prevent alcohol and/or other drug use, and were delivered in a school‐based setting. Risk of bias was assessed by two independent reviewers. Because of the heterogeneity of the included studies, it was not possible to conduct a meta‐analysis and a qualitative description of the studies was provided.Key Findings.From a total of 1654 screened papers, 22 research papers met inclusion criteria, which included 13 trials of 10 programs. Of these, nine programs demonstrated significant intervention effects in terms of delaying or reducing adolescent alcohol and/or other drug use in at least one trial.Conclusion.This is the first review of combined student‐ and parent‐based interventions to prevent and reduce alcohol and other drug use. Whilst existing combined student‐ and parent‐based programs have shown promising results, key gaps in the literature have been identified and are discussed in the context of the development of future prevention programs. [Newton NC, Champion KE, Slade T, Chapman C, Stapinski L, Koning I, Tonks Z, Teesson M. A systematic review of combined student‐ and parent‐based programs to prevent alcohol and other drug use among adolescents.Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;36:337‐351]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Parent- based interventions (i.e., focused solely on parents) and combined student- and parent- based pre vention programs have been shown to produce beneficial effects on adolescent substance use outcomes 286 .”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [286]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Studies of primary out comes have found that family- based programs can prevent alco hol, tobacco and drug use in young people, with effects persisting longer than 12 months.”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [286]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817
Education at a glance: OECD indicators, 2002
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-4369 · Cited by 2,758
Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., Mościcki, E. K., Schinke, S., Valentine, J. C., & Ji, P. (2005) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y · Cited by 1,338
Boca, F. K. D., & Darkes, J. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1359-6357.2003.00586.x · Cited by 1,138
Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research
Novins, D. K. (1995) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199503000-00028 · Cited by 1,085
Issues in Disseminating and Replicating Effective Prevention Programs
Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/b:prev.0000013981.28071.52 · Cited by 794
Ryan, S., Jorm, A. F., & Lubman, D. I. (2010) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00048674.2010.501759 · Cited by 680
Wood, M. D., Read, J., Mitchell, R., & Brand, N. H. (2004) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.18.1.19 · Cited by 633
Gottfredson, D. C., Cook, T. D., Gardner, F. E. M., Gorman-Smith, D., Howe, G. W., Sandler, I. N., & Zafft, K. M. (2015) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x · Cited by 627
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Organization WH, 2014, Global status report on alcohol and health 2014
- AIHW, 2014, National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report 2013
- Roche A, 2014, Alcohol education: what really works in schools? National Centre for Education and Training in Addiction (NCETA)
- 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.032 · DOI
- 10.1080/09540260701797753 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–111 of 111
Rømer Thomsen, K., Vallentin-Holbech, L., Xylander, S., Wellnitz, K. B., Tolstrup, J., Nielsen, A. S., & Ewing, S. W. F. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24432118
Tinner, L., Palmer, J. C., Lloyd, E. C., Caldwell, D. M., MacArthur, G. J., Dias, K., Langford, R. M., Redmore, J., Wittkop, L., Watkins, S., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20000464
Tinner, L., Palmer, J. C., Lloyd, E. C., Caldwell, D. M., MacArthur, G. J., Dias, K., Langford, R. M., Redmore, J., Wittkop, L., Watkins, S., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20000470
Parental Beliefs Are Associated with Youth Response to Alcohol Intervention
Calihan, J. B., Minegishi, M., Levy, S., Stamoulis, C., & Weitzman, E. R. (2026) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2026.2637140
Psychosocial latent profiles of adolescent alcohol use in Ecuador
Sinchi-Sinchi, H., Moral-Jiménez, M. D. L. V., Ramírez, A., Burgos‐Benavides, L., Díez, F. J. H., & Rodríguez‐Díaz, F. J. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106939
Hodder, R. K., O’Brien, K. M., Wolfenden, L., Nathan, N., Gillham, K. E., Bowman, J., Searston, J., & Wiggers, J. H. (2026) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1002/hpja.70189
A Pragmatic Approach to Legal Cannabis and Youth in Germany: Prevalence, Risk, and Harm Prevention
Stallwitz, A. (2026) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/00914509261454961
Tempchin, J., Davis, W. J., Margaris, A. M., Buck, A. C., Cruthird, D. M., White, E. T., Cole, H. E., Dennhardt, A. A., & Murphy, J. G. (2026) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2026.2682304
Rahman, M. A., Mostafa, G., Maua, J., Yasmin, N., Hasan, S. M. M., & Roy, A. (2026) · Islami Bank Medical College Journal · doi:10.70945/ibmcj.v21i02.0203
Dash, G. F., Thomsen, K. R., Jensen, N. H., Squeglia, L. M., Kirkland, A., Pfeifer, J. H., Berger, E. L., Leventhal, A. M., & Ewing, S. W. F. (2026) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106935
John, M., & Ngwarati, C. (2026) · Journal of Substance Use · doi:10.1080/14659891.2026.2722143
Metadata
- Authors
- Newton, N. C., Champion, K. E., Slade, T., Chapman, C., Stapinski, L., Koning, I., Tonks, Z., & Teesson, M.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Newton, Nicola C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-23
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-351
- ISSN
- 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3362
- OpenAlex
- W2604090325
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1056432)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
- Keywords
- adolescent alcohol use, adolescent drug use, substance use prevention, school-based prevention, parental involvement, universal prevention, intervention efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Male, Students, Program Evaluation, Parenting, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
