The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How has access to legal cannabis changed over time? An analysis of the cannabis retail market in Canada 2 years following the legalisation of recreational cannabis
Abstract
Introduction: This study describes the legal recreational cannabis market across Canada over the 2 years following legalisation. We compared changes in access to the legal cannabis retail market for all provinces and territories (jurisdictions) in Canada and explored differences between jurisdictions. Methods: We collected data for all legal cannabis stores in Canada over five time periods following legalisation in October 2018. We examined the following measures by jurisdiction and retail model (public vs. private operation): absolute and per capita store numbers, hours of operation and store access across neighbourhoods. Results: Two years following legalisation, there were a total of 1183 legal cannabis stores open across Canada (3.7 stores per 100 000 individuals aged 15+). There was wide variation between jurisdictions in access to retail stores, with the lowest stores per capita in Quebec and Ontario (0.6 and 1.6 per 100 000), and the highest in Alberta and Yukon (14.3 per 100 000 in both). Jurisdictions with private retail models had more stores (4.8 vs. 1.0 per 100 000), held greater median weekly hours (80 vs. 69) and experienced greater store growth over time compared to public models. After adjusting for confounders, there were 1.96 times (95% confidence intervals: 1.84, 2.09) more cannabis stores within 1000 m of the lowest‐ compared to the highest‐income quintile neighbourhoods. Discussion and Conclusions: While access to the recreational cannabis retail market has increased following legalisation, there is substantial variation in access between jurisdictions and evidence of concentration in lower‐income neighbourhoods. These differences may contribute to disparities in cannabis use and harms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retail cannabis stores in Canada are concentrated in low socio-economic status neighbourhoods.
“Retail cannabis stores in Canada are concentrated in low socio‐economic status neighbourhoods [51].”
From The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1503/cmaj.150657 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103028 · DOI
- 10.1503/cmaj.100825 · DOI
- 10.1111/add.12718 · DOI
- 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.58 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.002 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305191 · DOI
- 10.1111/add.15420 · DOI
- 10.9778/cmajo.20190012 · DOI
- 10.1080/10826084.2019.1608249 · DOI
- 10.1111/add.15019 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02658.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108794 · DOI
- 10.1111/add.12718 · DOI
- Rotermann M, 2020, What has changed since cannabis was legalized?, Heal Rep, 31, 11
- 10.1111/add.14597 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.009 · DOI
- 10.1155/2016/7193740 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijerph10127299 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305014 · DOI
- 10.9778/cmajo.20190229 · DOI
- Statistics Canada.Detailed household final consumption expenditure Canada quarterly [Internet];2020. Available at:https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=3610012401
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review
Hall, W., Stjepanović, D., Dawson, D., & Leung, J. (2023) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16274 · Cited by 112
Unintentional Pediatric Cannabis Exposures After Legalization of Recreational Cannabis in Canada
Myran, D. T., Cantor, N., Finkelstein, Y., Pugliese, M., Guttmann, A., Jesseman, R., & Tanuseputro, P. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42521 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Myran, D. T., Staykov, E., Cantor, N., Taljaard, M., Quach, B. I., Hawken, S., & Tanuseputro, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Ottawa Hospital (CA)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Myran, Daniel T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-07-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 377-385
- ISSN
- 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3362
- OpenAlex
- W3182581909
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (452360)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- access to cannabis, jurisdictional variation, Canada
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Canada, Cannabis, Humans, Legislation, Drug, Ontario, Yukon Territory, Marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review