Exploring patient experience and satisfaction with depot buprenorphine formulations: A mixed‐methods study
Open accessAbstract
Introduction The introduction of depot buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence allows for reduced dosing frequency compared with conventional treatments, such as oral methadone and sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone. Reduced dosing frequency is perceived to reduce issues such as high out-of-pocket costs, frequent attendance to pharmacies, stigmatisation and the risk of diversion for unsanctioned opioid use. This study aims to explore the experiences of patients receiving depot buprenorphine from an Australian publicly operated drug and alcohol service. Methods Participants were recruited from the service over a 5-week period in 2021. Twenty-eight participants consented to be involved in a mixed methods quantitative verbal survey and qualitative interview process. Results The majority of participants reported satisfaction with depot buprenorphine across the domains of efficacy, convenience and global satisfaction. Participants perceived benefits as increased convenience, reduced stigmatisation and the inability to 'skip' daily Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Dependence (MATOD) doses. There were mixed experiences with the ability for depot buprenorphine to 'hold' participants throughout the dosing interval. Reduced contact and disconnection from healthcare services were reported as an issue for some participants when initiating depot buprenorphine. Discussion and conclusions Patient perceptions of depot buprenorphine appear to be deeply rooted in prior expe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These factors suggest a potential for improved retention on extended-release buprenorphine for later adopters.
“These factors all suggest a potential for improved retention on extended-release buprenorphine for later adopters.14,15”
From Economic Evaluation of Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Qualitative research suggests notable benefits associated with extended-release buprenorphine, including a decrease in stigma, ability to lead a "normal life," and increased convenience.
“Nevertheless, qualitative research suggests some notable benefits associated with extended-release buprenorphine, including a decrease in stigma, ability to lead a “normal life,” and increased convenience.14,15”
From Economic Evaluation of Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., & Redwood, S. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-117 · Cited by 10,865 · see citing works
Haight, B. R., Learned, S. M., Laffont, C. M., Fudala, P. J., Zhao, Y., Garofalo, A. S., Greenwald, M. K., Nadipelli, V. R., Ling, W., Heidbreder, C., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32259-1 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Economic Evaluation of Extended-Release Buprenorphine for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder
Flam-Ross, J. M., Marsh, E., Weitz, M., Savinkina, A., Schackman, B. R., Wang, J., Madushani, R. W. M. A., Morgan, J. R., Barocas, J. A., Walley, A. Y., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29583 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allen, E., Samadian, S., Altobelli, G., Johnson, J., & Holmwood, C.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- SA Health (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, Eve
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-02-14
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 791-802
- ISSN
- 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3362
- OpenAlex
- W4320857787
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- opioid use disorder, patient satisfaction, patient experience, reduced dosing frequency, stigma, drug and alcohol services, treatment efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Buprenorphine, Naloxone Drug Combination, Analgesics, Opioid, Australia, Buprenorphine, Humans, Methadone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Patient Satisfaction, Opiate Substitution Treatment, Patient Outcome Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review