Early feeding after esophageal variceal band ligation in cirrhotics is safe: Randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background and aim Oral feeding following variceal ligation in cirrhotics is usually delayed due to fear of rebleeding. Solid diet is usually further delayed (until 72 h) despite lack of evidence. We aimed to compare the impact of early versus delayed feeding on rebleeding following variceal ligation. Methods This was a prospective randomized controlled trial including patients undergoing variceal ligation for active esophageal variceal bleeding. Patients were randomized into two groups. In the early-feeding group, liquid diet was given after 1 h following variceal ligation and a regular solid diet was resumed after 4 h. In the delayed-feeding group, patients fasted for the first 4 h after variceal ligation, liquid diet was given until 24 h, soft diet for the next 48 h and a regular solid diet after 72 h. Results There were 52 and 49 patients in the early and delayed feeding groups, respectively. Very early rebleeding rates [2 (3.84%) vs 1 (2.04%); P ≥ 0.99] and delayed rebleeding rates [2 (3.84%) vs 4 (8.16%); P = 0.75] were similar in both groups. Protein and calorie intake in the early-feeding group was significantly better and early infections in active bleeders were significantly lower compared to the delayed-feeding group. One-month mortality was similar in both groups [3 (5.76%) vs 4 (8.16%); P = 0.75]. Conclusion Early feeding with a regular solid diet in conscious patients after successful variceal ligation for esophageal varices is safe, provides better nutrition an…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an RCT including 100 patients, early feeding starting on day one shortened the hospital stay compared to nil by mouth until day three.
“In an RCT including 100 patients early feeding starting 1647 on day one shortened the hospital stay”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [224]
In that RCT, early feeding did not affect treatment outcomes compared to nil by mouth until day three.
“and did not affect treatment outcomes compared to nil 1648 by mouth until day three [224].”
From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [224]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition
Thibault, R., Abbasoglu, O., Ioannou, E., Meija, L., Ottens-Oussoren, K., Pichard, C., Rothenberg, E., Rubin, D., Siljamäki-Ojansuu, U., Vaillant, M.-F., et al. (2021) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.039 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sidhu, S. S., Goyal, O., Singh, S., Kishore, H., Chhina, R. S., & Sidhu, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Charles University (CZ)
- Dayanand Medical College & Hospital (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sidhu, Sandeep Singh
- Venue
- Digestive Endoscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-24
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 646-652
- ISSN
- 0915-5635 (ISSN-L)
- 1443-1661
- OpenAlex
- W2943097089
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digestive Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- esophageal varices, variceal ligation, early feeding, delayed feeding, rebleeding, liver cirrhosis, protein and calorie intake, mortality
- MeSH terms
- Congresses as Topic, Enteral Nutrition, Esophageal and Gastric Varices, Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Ligation, Liver Cirrhosis, Societies, Medical, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Time-to-Treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review