Individual differences in the shape bias in preschool children with specific language impairment and typical language development: Theoretical and clinical implications
Abstract
We investigated whether preschool children with specific language impairment (SLI) exhibit the shape bias in word learning: the bias to generalize based on shape rather than size, color, or texture in an object naming context (‘This is a wek; find another wek’) but not in a non‐naming similarity classification context (‘See this? Which one goes with this one?’). Fifty‐four preschool children (16 with SLI, 16 children with typical language [TL] in an equated control group, and 22 additional children with TL included in individual differences analyses but not group comparisons) completed a battery of linguistic and cognitive assessments and two experiments. In Experiment 1, children made generalization choices in object naming and similarity classification contexts on separate days, from options similar to a target object in shape, color, or texture. On average, TL children exhibited the shape bias in an object naming context, but children with SLI did not. In Experiment 2, we tested whether the failure to exhibit the shape bias might be linked to ability to detect systematicities in the visual domain. Experiment 2 supported this hypothesis, in that children with SLI failed to learn simple paired visual associations that were readily learned by children with TL. Analyses of individual differences in the two studies revealed that visual paired‐associate learning predicted degree of shape bias in children with SLI and TL better than any other measure of nonverbal intelligence or standard assessments of language ability. We discuss theoretical and clinical implications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-linguistic abilities (e.g., sound discrimination, expressive prosody, phonological working memory, associative learning, executive skills) may significantly contribute to children's linguistic difficulties.
“The assessment should also be extended to non-linguistic abilities (e.g., sound discrimination, expressive prosody, phonological working memory, associative learning, executive skills) that may significantly contribute to children’s linguistic difficulties [90,91,92,93,94].”
From Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [93]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Collisson, B. A., Grela, B., Spaulding, T., Rueckl, J. G., & Magnuson, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Haskins Laboratories (US)
- Corresponding author
- Collisson, Beverly Anne
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-08-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-388
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2126540929
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSF CAREER (to J.S.M.) (0748684)
- P01-HD001994 to Haskins Laboratories (J. Rueckle, PI) (P01-HD001994)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- shape bias, specific language impairment, word learning, preschool children, individual differences, object naming, similarity classification, nonverbal intelligence, typical language development
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Individuality, Language Development Disorders, Language Tests, Linguistics, Male, Semantics, Size Perception, Verbal Learning, Vocabulary, Reproducibility of Results, Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review