Theory of mind, executive function, and lying in children: a meta‐analysis
Abstract
Scientific research on how children learn to tell lies has existed for more than a century. Earlier studies mainly focused on moral, social, and situational factors contributing to the development of lying. Researchers have only begun to explore the cognitive correlations of children's lying in the last two decades. Cognitive theories suggest that theory of mind (ToM) and executive function (EF) should be closely related to the development of lying since lying is, in essence, ToM and EF in action. Yet, findings from empirical studies are mixed. To address this issue, the current meta‐analysis reviewed all prior literature that examined the relations between children's lying and ToM and/or between children's lying and EF. In total, 47 papers consisting of 5099 participants between 2 and 19 years of age were included, which yielded 74 effect sizes for ToM and 94 effect sizes for EF. Statistically significant but relatively small effects were found between children's lying and ToM ( r = .17) and between lying and EF ( r = .13). Furthermore, EF’s correlation with children's initial lies was significantly smaller than its correlation with children's ability to maintain lies. This comprehensive meta‐analysis provides a clear picture of the associations between children's ToM/EF and their lying behavior and confirms that ToM and EF indeed play a positive role in children's lying and its development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings were consistent with findings from a previous meta-analysis involving a much wider age range.
“These findings were consistent with findings from a previous meta-analysis involving a much wider age range (Sai et al., 2021).”
From Early childhood executive function predicts concurrent and later social and behavioral outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as Sai et al., 2021
Our effect size appeared stronger in magnitude than that of Sai et al. (2021).
“While we cannot compare the effect sizes between our meta-analysis and that of Sai et al. (2021) directly, our effect size appeared stronger in magnitude than theirs.”
From Early childhood executive function predicts concurrent and later social and behavioral outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as Sai et al., 2021
The stronger effect size may be due to inclusion criteria regarding age and typical samples.
“This is possibly because of our inclusion criteria regarding age and typical samples, although we note that Sai et al. (2021) did not find a moderating effect of age in their meta-analysis.”
From Early childhood executive function predicts concurrent and later social and behavioral outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as Sai et al., 2021
Sai et al. (2021) did not find a moderating effect of age in their meta-analysis.
“although we note that Sai et al. (2021) did not find a moderating effect of age in their meta-analysis.”
From Early childhood executive function predicts concurrent and later social and behavioral outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. (2024) · cites this paper as Sai et al., 2021
Cites
Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204529 · Cited by 2,901 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional imaging of ‘theory of mind’
Gallagher, H. L., & Frith, C. D. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00025-6 · Cited by 2,092 · see citing works
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0032968 · Cited by 1,342 · see citing works
Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial
Assink, M., & Wibbelink, C. J. M. (2016) · The Quantitative Methods for Psychology · doi:10.20982/tqmp.12.3.p154 · Cited by 1,330 · see citing works
Field, A. P., & Gillett, R. (2010) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711010x502733 · Cited by 1,162 · see citing works
Development of inhibitory control across the life span.
Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.205 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
Sterne, J. A. C., Becker, B. J., & Egger, M. (2005) · Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis · doi:10.1002/0470870168.ch5 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
White lie-telling in children for politeness purposes
Talwar, V., Murphy, S. M., & Lee, K. (2007) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025406073530 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Self-citationTheory-of-Mind Training Causes Honest Young Children to Lie
Ding, X. P., Wellman, H. M., Wang, Y., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615604628 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stucke, N. J., & Doebel, S. (2024) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000445 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sai, L., Shang, S., Tay, C., Liu, X., Sheng, T., Fu, G., Ding, X. P., & Lee, K.
- Affiliations
- Hangzhou Normal University (CN)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Ding, Xiao Pan
- Lee, Kang
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e13096-e13096
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W3127897338
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- National University of Singapore
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1736125, 32071068)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- lying, theory of mind, executive function, children, deception, cognitive development, moral development
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Development, Humans, Morals, Executive Function, Theory of Mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review