The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy: How Preschoolers Perceive and Judge Moral Hypocrites
Open accessAbstract
Many previous studies indicate that children are highly sensitive to the immoral behavior of others, preferring prosocial over antisocial characters. Accordingly, children avoid transgressors from a very early age. A special kind of transgressor is the moral hypocrite, who not only acts immorally but also acts in contrast to what they preach. There are very few studies establishing whether children recognize moral hypocrisy and if it impacts their moral judgment. We ran three studies with preschoolers aged 4 to 6 years on whether children recognize moral hypocrisy and how children assess moral hypocrisy. In Studies 2 and 3, we also tested false‐signaling theory as an explanation of the more negative assessments of moral hypocrites. In Study 1 (N = 133), we showed that children indeed assess moral hypocrites more negatively than nonhypocritical moral transgressors. In Study 2 (N = 115), we initially demonstrated that the assessment of moral hypocrites results from their inconsistency between words and deeds. Study 3 (N = 159) replicated the results of Studies 1 and 2 and, by excluding an alternative explanation, explained that moral hypocrites are perceived as less moral and liked less due to the false signals that they send.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) · doi:10.1111/j.1467- · Cited by 16,131
A Design Framework for Instrumenting Analytic Provenance for Problem-Solving Tasks
Yang, L., Morizet‐Mahoudeaux, P., Guénand, A., & Mouloudi, A. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8612-0_66 · Cited by 6,595
Social evaluation by preverbal infants
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06288 · Cited by 1,566
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Morgan, J. E., Rutter, M. L., Taylor, A., Arseneault, L., Tully, L. A., Jacobs, C., Kim‐Cohen, J., & Polo-Tomás, M. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.149 · Cited by 911
Tomasello, M. (2019) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674988651 · Cited by 799
Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others
Hamlin, J. K., & Wynn, K. (2010) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001 · Cited by 661
The Acquisition of Complex Sentences
Diessel, H. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511486531 · Cited by 651
Consequences of “Minimal” Group Affiliations in Children
Dunham, Y. C., Baron, A. S., & Carey, S. E. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01577.x · Cited by 632
Foundations of cooperation in young children
Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.003 · Cited by 586
Cited by
Zhunapinng, Zhou, J., Wang, Y. G., & Li, Y. (2026) · Child Development · doi:10.1093/chidev/aacag204
Metadata
- Authors
- Myślińska Szarek, K., & Baryła, W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology University SWPS Warszawa Poland
- Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-10-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e13580-e13580
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W4403499083
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- moral hypocrisy, preschool children, moral judgment, social perception, prosocial behavior, antisocial behavior, social evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Morals, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
