Cited by 1Infant Development and Preterm CareFamily and Disability Support ResearchCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding the needs of families after NICU discharge to inform a peer support program

Open access
·2016·Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract

Study Participants & Setting:A convenience sample of children, ages 10-18, with a diagnosis of either CP or PD were invited into this IRB approved study.Subjects were excluded if unable to read English at a 3rd grade level.Caregivers of eligible participants were also enrolled in the study.Recruitment was through outpatient clinics and a community program for children with PD.Materials/Methods: Surveys were completed by the participant and designated caregiver.Caregiver surveys included demographic information and questions about their child's motor ability, cognitive function, and comorbidities.The participant survey was a modified version of the California Bullying Victimization Scale (CBVS), 2011.This 11-item questionnaire utilized a Likert-type scale to identify whether participants were "bully-", "peer-", or "non-victims" based on the frequency of victimization over the past month and on the presence of a power imbalance.Descriptive statistics were utilized for the preliminary analysis of these surveys.Results: 51 participants met inclusion criteria for the study.44 children had a primary diagnosis of CP and 7 had a PD due to another cause (stroke, muscular dystrophy, etc.).The study included 23 males (45%) and 28 females (55%).The mean age was 14.1 years (range 10.0-18.3y),corresponding to a mean grade level of 8.4.Overall, 16% of participants were considered bully-victims, 39% peer-victims, and 45% non-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dmcn.14_13225

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Venue
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
58
Issue
S5
Pages
89-90
ISSN
  • 0012-1622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8749
OpenAlex
W4236627571
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
peer victimization, bullying, cerebral palsy, pediatric disability, children with disabilities, peer support programs, caregiver perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review