Characterizing problematic hypoglycaemia: iterative design and preliminary psychometric validation of the Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire (HypoA-Q)
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To design and conduct preliminary validation of a measure of hypoglycaemia awareness and problematic hypoglycaemia, the Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire. METHODS: Exploratory and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 17 adults (nine of whom were women) with Type 1 diabetes (mean ± sd age 48 ± 10 years). Questionnaire items were modified in consultation with diabetologists/psychologists. Psychometric validation was undertaken using data from 120 adults (53 women) with Type 1 diabetes (mean ± sd age 44 ± 16 years; 50% with clinically diagnosed impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia), who completed the following questionnaires: the Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire, the Gold score, the Clarke questionnaire and the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire. RESULTS: Iterative design resulted in 33 items eliciting responses about awareness of hypoglycaemia when awake/asleep and hypoglycaemia frequency, severity and impact (healthcare utilization). Psychometric analysis identified three subscales reflecting 'impaired awareness', 'symptom level' and 'symptom frequency'. Convergent validity was indicated by strong correlations between the 'impaired awareness' subscale and existing measures of awareness: (Gold: rs =0.75, P < 0.01; Clarke: rs =0.76, P < 0.01). Divergent validity was indicated by weaker correlations with diabetes-related distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes: rs =0.25, P < 0.01) and HbA1c (rs =-0.05, non-significant). The 'impaired awareness' subscale and other items discriminated between those with impaired and intact awareness (Gold score). The 'impaired awareness' subscale and other items contributed significantly to models explaining the occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia when asleep. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary validation shows the Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire has robust face and content validity; satisfactory structure; internal reliability; convergent, divergent and known groups validity. The impaired awareness subscale and other items contribute significantly to models explaining recall of severe and nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Prospective validation, including determination of a threshold to identify impaired awareness, is now warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Validated questionnaires for assessing impaired hypoglycemia awareness include the single-question Pedersen-Bjergaard and Gold tools; the Clarke and HypoA-Q tools are longer questionnaires that evaluate multiple domains of impaired hypoglycemia awareness.
“Validated questionnaires for assessing impaired hypoglycemia awareness include the single-question Pedersen-Bjergaard (111) and Gold (112) tools; the Clarke (113) and HypoA-Q (114) tools are longer questionnaires that evaluate multiple domains of impaired hypoglycemia awareness.”
From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [114]
The Pedersen-Bjergaard et al. questionnaire and Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire (HypoA-Q) can also identify IAH.
“The Pedersen-Bjergaard et al. questionnaire and Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire (HypoA-Q) can also identify IAH (118,119).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Speight, J., Barendse, S. M., Singh, H., Little, S. A., Inkster, B., Frier, B. M., Heller, S. R., Rutter, M. K., & Shaw, J. A. M.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- AHP Research Hornchurch UK
- University of Virginia (US)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Speight, J.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-14
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-385
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W1506735791
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Diabetes UK
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- hypoglycemia awareness, impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia, type 1 diabetes, nocturnal hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, psychometric validation, questionnaire development, diabetes distress
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Awareness, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Diagnostic Self Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review