Cited by 42Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Gestational diabetes and adiposity are independent risk factors for perinatal outcomes: A population based cohort study in Sweden

Open access
Hildén, K., Hanson, U., Persson, M., Magnuson, A., Simmons, D., Fadl, H.·2019·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the interaction effects of gestational diabetes (GDM) with obesity on perinatal outcomes. Methods: A population‐based cohort study in Sweden excluding women without pre‐gestational diabetes with a singleton birth between 1998 and 2012. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the potential independent associations of GDM and BMI with adverse perinatal outcomes as well as their interactions. Main outcome measures were malformations, stillbirths, perinatal mortality, low Apgar score, fetal distress, prematurity and Erb's palsy. Results: Some 1,294,006 women were included, with a GDM prevalence of 1% (n = 14,833). The rate of overweight/obesity was 67.7% in the GDM‐group and 36.1% in the non‐GDM‐group. No significant interaction existed. Offspring of women with GDM had significantly increased risk of malformations, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.16 (95% confidence intervals 1.06–1.26), prematurity, aOR 1.86 (1.76–1. 98), low Apgar score, aOR 1.36 (1.10–1.70), fetal distress, aOR 1.09 (1.02–1.16) and Erb's palsy aOR 2.26 (1.79–2.86). No risk for stillbirth or perinatal mortality was seen. Offspring of overweight (BMI 25–29.9 kg/m 2), obese (BMI 30–34.9 kg/m 2) and severely obese women (BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m 2) had significantly increased risks of all outcomes including stillbirth 1.51 (1.40–1.62) to 2.85 (2.52–3.22) and perinatal mortality 1.49 (1.40–1.59) to 2.83 (2.54–3.15). Conclusions: There is no interaction effect between GDM and BMI for the studied outcomes. Higher BMI and GDM are major independent risk factors for most serious adverse perinatal outcomes. More effective pre‐pregnancy and antenatal interventions are required to prevent serious adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with either GDM or high BMI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.13843

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [3]Fadl HE, Simmons D. Trends in diabetes in pregnancy in Sweden 1998–2012. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2016; 4: e000221. PMC4985983 27547412
  2. [4]Catalano PM, McIntyre HD, Cruickshank JK, McCance DR, Dyer AR, Metzger BE et al The hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome study: associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 780– 786. 22357187 PMC3308300
  3. [5]HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study: associations with maternal body mass index. BJOG 2010; 117: 575– 584. 20089115
  4. [6]Leng J, Shao P, Zhang C, Tian H, Zhang F, Zhang S et al Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in Chinese pregnant women: a prospective population‐based study in Tianjin. China. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0121029. 25799433 PMC4370728
  5. [7]Stothard KJ, Tennant PW, Bell R, Rankin J. Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2009; 301: 636– 650. 19211471
  6. [8]Chu SY, Kim SY, Lau J, Schmid CH, Dietz PM, Callaghan WM et al Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 223– 228. 17826400
  7. [9]Cnattingius S, Villamor E, Johansson S, Edstedt Bonamy AK, Persson M, Wikstrom AK et al Maternal obesity and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2013; 309: 2362– 2370. 23757084
  8. [10]Persson M, Johansson S, Villamor E, Cnattingius S. Maternal overweight and obesity and risks of severe birth‐asphyxia‐related complications in term infants: a population‐based cohort study in Sweden. PLoS Med 2014; 11: e1001648. 24845218 PMC4028185
  9. [11]Black MH, Sacks DA, Xiang AH, Lawrence JM. The relative contribution of prepregnancy overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain, and IADPSG‐defined gestational diabetes mellitus to fetal overgrowth. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 56– 62. 22891256 PMC3526206
  10. [12]Scott‐Pillai R, Spence D, Cardwell CR, Hunter A, Holmes VA. The impact of body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study in a UK obstetric population, 2004–2011. BJOG 2013; 120: 932– 939. 23530609
  11. [13]Hilden K, Hanson U, Persson M, Fadl H. Overweight and obesity: a remaining problem in women treated for severe gestational diabetes. Diabet Med 2016; 33: 1045– 1051. 27172974 PMC5089567
  12. [14]Billionnet C, Mitanchez D, Weill A, Nizard J, Alla F, Hartemann A et al Gestational diabetes and adverse perinatal outcomes from 716,152 births in France in 2012. Diabetologia 2017; 60: 636– 644. 28197657 PMC6518373
  13. [15]Parnell AS, Correa A, Reece EA. Pre‐pregnancy obesity as a modifier of gestational diabetes and birth defects associations: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21: 1105– 1120. 28120287
  14. [16]Kaur J. A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 943162. 24711954 PMC3966331
  15. [19]Anderberg E, Kallen K, Berntorp K, Frid A, Aberg A. A simplified oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy: compliance and results. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 1432– 1436. 17963051
  16. [20]World Health Organization. Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy. Geneva: WHO, 2013. 24199271
  17. [21]Persson M, Pasupathy D, Hanson U, Westgren M, Norman M. Pre‐pregnancy body mass index and the risk of adverse outcome in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a population‐based cohort study. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e000601. PMC3282288 22334581
  18. [22]Sheffield JS, Butler‐Koster EL, Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Maternal diabetes mellitus and infant malformations. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 925– 930. 12423854
  19. [23]Gabbay‐Benziv R, Reece EA, Wang F, Yang P. Birth defects in pregestational diabetes: defect range, glycemic threshold and pathogenesis. World J Diabetes 2015; 6: 481– 488. 25897357 PMC4398903
  20. [24]Feig DS, Hwee J, Shah BR, Booth GL, Bierman AS, Lipscombe LL. Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: a large, population‐based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2010. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 1590– 1596. 24705609
  21. [25]Yao R, Ananth CV, Park BY, Pereira L, Plante LA. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population‐based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 457. e451– 459. 24674712
  22. [26]Vasudevan C, Renfrew M, McGuire W. Fetal and perinatal consequences of maternal obesity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011; 96: F378– F382. 20530101
  23. [27]Ovesen PG, Jensen DM, Damm P, Rasmussen S, Kesmodel US. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. a nation‐wide study. J Matern‐Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1720– 1724. 25228278
  24. [30]Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 467– 471. 11172187
  25. [31]Persson M, Norman M, Hanson U. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a large, population‐based study. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 2005– 2009. 19675195 PMC2768194
  26. [32]Okby R, Sheiner E. Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus paralysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 286: 333– 336. 22437188
  27. [33]Lindqvist PG, Ajne G, Cooray C, Erichs K, Gudmundsson S, Dahlin LB. Identification of pregnancies at increased risk of brachial plexus birth palsy – the construction of a weighted risk score. J Matern‐Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 252– 256. 23718806
  28. [34]Fadl HE, Ostlund IK, Magnuson AF, Hanson US. Maternal and neonatal outcomes and time trends of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sweden from 1991 to 2003. Diabet Med 2010; 27: 436– 441. 20536516
  29. [35]Muktabhant B, Lawrie TA, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M. Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database SystRev 2015; (6) CD007145. PMC9428894 26068707
  30. [36]Opray N, Grivell RM, Deussen AR, Dodd JM. Directed preconception health programs and interventions for improving pregnancy outcomes for women who are overweight or obese. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (7) CD010932. 26171908 PMC10656571

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hildén, K., Hanson, U., Persson, M., Magnuson, A., Simmons, D., & Fadl, H.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Hildén, K.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
151-157
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2913305891
Cited by
42
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, body mass index, perinatal outcomes, adverse pregnancy outcomes, congenital malformations, stillbirth, perinatal mortality, preterm birth, low Apgar score, fetal distress, Erb's palsy, pre-pregnancy weight, risk factors, interaction effects, singleton pregnancy, antenatal interventions, Sweden, population-based cohort
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adult, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Maternal Age, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Registries, Risk Factors, Sweden, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Adiposity, Overweight, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review