Sweet dreams or bitter nightmare: a narrative review of 25 years of research on the role of sleep in diabetes and the contributions of behavioural science
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this review was to provide an overview of developments, clinical implications and gaps in knowledge regarding the relationship between diabetes and sleep over the past 25 years, with special focus on contributions from the behavioural sciences. Multiple prospective observational and experimental studies have shown a link between suboptimal sleep and impaired glucose tolerance, decreased insulin sensitivity and the development of type 2 diabetes. While prevalence rates of suboptimal sleep vary widely according to definition, assessment and sample, suboptimal subjective sleep quality appears to be a common reality for one-third of people with type 1 diabetes and over half of people with type 2 diabetes. Both physiological and psychosocial factors may impair sleep in these groups. In turn, suboptimal sleep can negatively affect glycaemic outcomes directly or indirectly via suboptimal daytime functioning (energy, mood, cognition) and self-care behaviours. Technological devices supporting diabetes self-care may have both negative and positive effects. Diabetes and its treatment also affect the sleep of significant others. Research on the merits of interventions aimed at improving sleep for people with diabetes is in its infancy. Diabetes and sleep appear to be reciprocally related. Discussion of sleep deserves a central place in regular diabetes care. Multi-day, multi-method studies may shed more light on the complex relationship between sleep and diabetes at an individual level. Intervention studies are warranted to examine the potential of sleep interventions in improving outcomes for people with diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Nefs, G. M., Bazelmans, E., Donga, E., Tack, C. J., & de Galan, B. E.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Department of Internal Medicine Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Nefs, G.M.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-27
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 418-426
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2996727485
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (451-16-033)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- sleep, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, sleep quality, behavioral science, glycemic control, diabetes self-care, sleep interventions, psychosocial factors
- MeSH terms
- Behavioral Sciences, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Time Factors, Prevalence, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review