Postprandial renal haemodynamic effect of lixisenatide vs once‐daily insulin‐glulisine in patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin‐glargine: An 8‐week, randomised, open‐label trial
Open accessAbstract
Aim: To determine whether lixisenatide, a prandial short‐acting glucagon‐like peptide receptor agonist ( GLP‐1RA ), ameliorates postprandial glomerular hyperfiltration in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) compared with insulin‐glulisine ( iGlu ). Methods: Postprandial renal haemodynamic effects of 8‐week treatment with lixisenatide 20 µg vs once‐daily titrated iGlu were measured in 35 overweight patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on insulin‐glargine, with or without metformin [mean ± SD age 62 ± 7 years, HbA1c 8.0% ± 0.9%, estimated glomerular filtration rate ( GFR ) 85 ± 12 mL /min/1.73 m 2 , median ( IQR ) urinary albumin/creatinine ratio 1.5 (0.9‐3.0) mg/mmol]. After a standardised breakfast, GFR (primary endpoint) and effective renal plasma flow ( ERPF ) were determined by inulin and para‐aminohippuric acid renal clearance, respectively, based on timed urine sampling. Intrarenal haemodynamic functions were estimated using Gomez equations. Results: Compared with iGlu , lixisenatide did not affect GFR [+0.1 mL /min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI −9 to 9)], ERPF [−17 mL /min/1.73 m 2 (−61 to 26)], other (intra‐)renal haemodynamics or renal damage markers, but increased fractional sodium excretion [+0.25% (0.09‐0.41)] and urinary pH [+0.7 (0.3‐1.2)]. Plasma renin, angiotensin‐ II and aldosterone were unchanged. Lixisenatide and iGlu reduced HbA1c similarly, by 0.8% ± 0.1% and 0.6% ± 0.1%, respectively, while postprandial glucose was lower with lixisenatide ( P = .002). Compared with iGlu , lixisenatide reduced bodyweight [−1.4 kg (−2.5 to −0.2)] and increased postprandial mean arterial pressure [+9 mm Hg (4‐14)]. Conclusion: Eight‐week lixisenatide treatment does not affect postprandial (intra‐)renal haemodynamics compared with iGlu when added to insulin‐glargine in patients with T2DM without overt nephropathy. Prolonged lixisenatide treatment has a sustained natriuretic effect, which is in contrast to previous reports on long‐acting GLP‐1RA , reduces body weight and increases postprandial blood pressure compared with iGlu . Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02276196
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As seen with SGLT2 inhibitors, the increase in urinary sodium excretion induced by GLP-1 receptor agonists is only present acutely.
“As seen with inhibitors of SGLT2, this increase in urinary sodium excretion is only present acutely (32).”
From GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes and obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Smits, M. M., Hoekstra, T., Kramer, M. H. H., Danser, A. H. J., Diamant, M., Joles, J. A., & van Raalte, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetes Center VU University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Tonneijck, Lennart
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-25
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1669-1680
- ISSN
- 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
- 1463-1326
- OpenAlex
- W2607841801
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sanofi-Aventis
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- lixisenatide, insulin glulisine, type 2 diabetes, glomerular hyperfiltration, glomerular filtration rate, effective renal plasma flow, GLP-1 receptor agonists, insulin glargine, fractional excretion of sodium, HbA1c, body weight
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor, Insulin Glargine, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Peptides, Risk Factors, Vascular Resistance, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Postprandial Period, Overweight, Renal Insufficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review