Cited by 29Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improvement of glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction by switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open‐label, parallel‐group comparison study ( SWITCH‐SEMA 1 study)

Open access

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the effects of switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to once‐weekly semaglutide on glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: In this multicentre, open‐labelled, prospective, randomized, parallel‐group comparison study, patients treated with liraglutide 0.9‐1.8 mg/day (plan A) or dulaglutide 0.75 mg/week (plan B) were either switched to semaglutide or continued current therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean change in glycated haemoglobin over 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints included the changes of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores, body weight and metabolic indices. Results: In total, 110 patients were enrolled, and 10 were excluded; therefore, 37 patients in plan A and 63 patients in plan B completed the study. Glycated haemoglobin levels were significantly reduced in the semaglutide group in both plans [plan A, 7.8% ± 1.0% to 7.8% ± 0.7% (liraglutide) vs. 7.9% ± 0.7% to 7.3% ± 0.7% (semaglutide), p < .01; plan B, 7.8% ± 1.0% to 7.9% ± 1.2% (dulaglutide) vs. 7.8% ± 0.8% to 7.1% ± 0.6% (semaglutide), p < .01]. Semaglutide also improved Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in both groups (plan A, +0.1 vs. +8.3, p < .01; plan B, −1.2 vs. +3.5, p < .01). Switching from dulaglutide yielded greater reductions in body weight and improved metabolic parameters. Conclusions: Once‐weekly semaglutide administration improved glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction after switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide. These results highlighted a useful treatment option for patients with metabolic abnormalities despite glucagon‐like receptor‐1 receptor agonist treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.14998

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1341 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30327-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/dom.12591 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30104-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s13300-020-00986-9 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/jdi.12913 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/dom.12602 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s13300-018-0397-1 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.101117 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/dom.13128 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/dom.12932 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.14814/phy2.13503 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/jdi.12906 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s13300-018-0414-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takahashi, Y., Nomoto, H., Yokoyama, H., Takano, Y., Nagai, S., Tsuzuki, A., Cho, K. Y., Miya, A., Kameda, H., Takeuchi, J., Taneda, S., Kurihara, Y., Atsumi, T., Nakamura, A., Miyoshi, H., & SWITCH‐SEMA 1 study group
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Jiyugaoka Medical Clinic Obihiro Japan
  • Tonan Hospital (JP)
  • NTT Medical Center Sapporo (JP)
  • Sapporo Diabetes and Thyroid Clinic Sapporo Japan
  • Diabetes Center Manda Memorial Hospital Sapporo Japan
  • Kurihara Clinic Sapporo Japan
Corresponding author
  • Nomoto, Hiroshi
  • Miyoshi, Hideaki
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-02-28
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1503-1511
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W4318754266
Cited by
29
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, treatment switching, glycemic control, HbA1c, treatment satisfaction, body weight, metabolic parameters, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Glycemic Control, Semaglutide, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments, Personal Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review