Cited by 13Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmaceutical studies and practices

Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence of Orforglipron Tablets and Capsules in Healthy Participants With Obesity or Overweight

Open access
Ma, Xiaosu, Li, Ying Grace, Raha, Sohini, Sperry, David C., Coutant, David E., Bhattachar, Shobha·2026·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the bioequivalence of orally administered orforglipron tablets and capsules in participants with obesity or overweight who were otherwise healthy. Materials and Methods: This phase 1, multicenter, open‐label, multiple‐dose, dose‐escalation study was conducted in 429 healthy adults. Study participants received each orforglipron capsule and tablet dose strength once daily for 7 days in the fasted state at capsule doses of 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 36 mg and corresponding tablet doses of 0.8, 2.5, 5.5, 9, 14.5, and 17.2 mg. The primary endpoint was steady‐state area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC 0–24,ss ) and steady‐state maximum observed drug concentration ( C max,ss ). A prespecified mixed scaling approach was applied to evaluate bioequivalence. Safety and tolerability of the tablets and capsules were also assessed. Results: Bioequivalence was demonstrated between capsules and dose‐adjusted tablets across all six doses. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of the geometric least‐squares means of AUC 0–24,ss and C max,ss between each capsule dose and corresponding tablet dose met the predefined criteria for bioequivalence. The safety profiles were similar between tablets and capsules, with no apparent differences or trends in the incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events by presentation or with increasing dose. Conclusions: Once‐daily orforglipron capsules and dose‐adjusted tablets demonstrated pharmacokinetic bioequivalence at all tested doses and showed similar safety and tolerability profiles, with mostly mild treatment‐emergent adverse events consistent with previous orforglipron clinical trials. ClinicalTrials .gov Identifier: NCT06440980.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dom.70783

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The doses of orforglipron capsule formulation (1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 mg) are equivalent to tablet doses of 0.8, 2.5, 5.5, 9, 14.5, 17.2 mg, respectively, which are approved in the USA.

    “the doses have been shown as the equivalent to tablet doses of 0.8, 2.5, 5.5, 9, 14.5 and 17.2 mg, respectively, which are approved in the USA13.”

    From Orforglipron for maintenance of body weight reduction: the double-blind, randomized phase 3b ATTAIN-MAINTAIN trial (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Methods (Study Design) list the six capsule doses and their corresponding tablet doses, and the Results (Pharmacokinetics) report bioequivalence for all six pairs. No passage in our copy says the tablet doses are approved in the USA; the paper’s references to FDA guidance concern study design, not approval. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]M. Marassi and G. P. Fadini, “ Real‐World Evidence on Oral Semaglutide for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. A Narrative Review for Clinical Practice,” Clinical Therapeutics 47, no. 1 (2025): 102– 110. 39616020
  2. [2]A. Saran, R. Raisinghani, S. Paliwal, and S. Sharma, “ GLP‐1R Agonists: Recent Advances, Current Gaps, and Future Challenges,” Molecular Diversity 30, no. 1 (2026): 101– 112. 40301134
  3. [7]J. Rosenstock, D. Yabe, D. Cox, et al., “ Efficacy and Safety of Once‐Daily Oral Orforglipron Compared With Oral Semaglutide in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (ACHIEVE‐3): A Multinational, Multicentre, Non‐Inferiority, Open‐Label, Randomised, Phase 3 Trial,” Lancet 407 (2026): 1147– 1160. 41765029

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, X., Li, Y. G., Raha, S., Sperry, D. C., Coutant, D. E., & Bhattachar, S.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, Xiaosu
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-04-17
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
5803-5809
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W7154687593
Cited by
13
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13
FWCI
54.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
orforglipron, bioequivalence, obesity, overweight, pharmacokinetics, dose escalation, drug safety and tolerability, GLP-1 receptor agonists
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Capsules, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Oxadiazoles, Tablets, Therapeutic Equivalency, Fluorine Compounds, Anti-Obesity Agents, Area Under Curve, Overweight, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review