The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How does the radiation therapist affect the cancer patients' experience of the radiation treatment?
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies of head and neck cancer patients going through radiation treatment have shown the treatment causes great physical as well as psychosocial problems. Although previous research acknowledges the needs of cancer patients, there is a lack of literature regarding the patient's perspective about radiation therapy. Studies have rarely focused on the whole experience of radiation treatment. The aim of this study was to illuminate how head and neck cancer patients' encounters with radiation therapists influence patients' experiences going through radiation therapy. The study was conducted via qualitative interviews, using a phenomenological hermeneutic approach. Eleven cancer patients were treated with radiation therapy. This study showed that encounters with radiation therapists have a significant influence on patients' experiences. Cancer patients' contact with radiation therapists can lead to increases or decreases in existential anxiety. When patients experience that the radiation therapist is professionally competent, the existential anxiety decreases. When the radiation therapist make time to build relationships and take responsibility for treatment and side effects, this creates a feeling of security and the treatment is easier to review. The study may indicate that the patients' existential anxiety increases when the radiation therapist shows professional incompetence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“there is research which indicates that patients' anxiety levels increase when RT-nurses show professional incompetence (Egestad 2013).”
From The influence of a department's psychosocial climate and treatment environment on cancer patients' anxiety during radiotherapy (2016) · cites this paper as Egestad 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience
Lindseth, A., & Norberg, A. (2004) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x · Cited by 1,867
Nurse–patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences
McCabe, C. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00817.x · Cited by 566
Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning
McFadden, G., & Ricoeur, P. (1978) · Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/430446 · Cited by 370
Epstein, J. B., Robertson, M., Emerton, S., Phillips, N., & Stevenson‐Moore, P. (2001) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.1049 · Cited by 287
Health-Related Quality of Life in Oral Cancer: A Review
Chandu, A., Smith, A. C., & Rogers, S. N. (2006) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.028 · Cited by 261
Ka, H. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 224
Caring and uncaring encounters within nursing and health care from the cancer patient's perspective
Halld??rsd??ttir, S., & Hamrin, E. K. F. (1997) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-199704000-00007 · Cited by 174
Changes and challenges to patients’ lifestyle patterns following treatment for head and neck cancer
Semple, C. J., Dunwoody, L., Kernohan, G. W., McCaughan, E., & Sullivan, K. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04698.x · Cited by 152
Lived experiences of eating problems for patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy
Larsson, M., Hedelin, B., & Athlin, E. E. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00751.x · Cited by 143
Poroch, D. (1995) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-199506000-00005 · Cited by 133
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Leaver, 2004, Principle and Practice of Radiation Therapy, 131
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mullaney, T., Olausson, K., Sharp, L., Zackrisson, B., Edvardsson, D., & Nyholm, T. (2016) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2015.06.009 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Egestad, H.
- Affiliations
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Egestad, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer Care
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 580-588
- ISSN
- 0961-5423 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105822199
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Cancer Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Keywords
- radiotherapy, head and neck cancer, radiation therapists, patient experience, existential anxiety, professional competence, therapeutic relationship, adverse effects, patient security
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Clinical Competence, Communication, Fear, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Physician-Patient Relations, Quality of Life, Radiology, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review