ACADEMIC PROBATION, STUDENT PERFORMANCE, AND STRATEGIC COURSE‐TAKING
Abstract
We use a regression discontinuity design to study how academic probation affects outcomes and course‐taking behaviors at a large public university in the United States. Consistent with past work, students placed on probation improve their grade point average (GPA) in the subsequent semester. We document that part of this GPA improvement is attributable to strategic course‐taking, and there is significant heterogeneity in these behaviors across race. Non‐minority students placed on probation attempt fewer credits, easier courses, and are more likely to withdraw from courses in the following term. In contrast, underrepresented minorities exhibit few of these behaviors, consistent with past work that suggests black and Hispanic students are less likely to possess helpful institutional knowledge and use available support systems such as academic counseling. (JEL I20, I23)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Academic performance requirements can distort behavior by leading students to seek lower-effort pathways to meet the requirements.
“Academic performance requirements can also potentially distort behavior in unproductive ways, as students seek lower-effort pathways to meet the requirements (see, e.g.Casey et al. [2018]).”
From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Casey et al. [2018]
Cites
Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence
Oster, E. (2019) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1080/07350015.2016.1227711 · Cited by 5,367 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions
Dynarski, S., Page, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30275 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Casey, M. D., Cline, J., Ost, B., & Qureshi, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Casey, Marcus D.
- Cline, Jeffrey
- Ost, Ben
- Qureshi, Javaeria A.
- Venue
- Economic Inquiry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-02-22
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1646-1677
- ISSN
- 0043-3640 (ISSN-L)
- 0095-2583
- 1465-7295
- OpenAlex
- W2791308159
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Economic Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UIC Office of Social Science Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- academic probation, student performance, grade point average, course load, course difficulty, course withdrawal, racial heterogeneity, underrepresented minorities, academic advising, institutional knowledge, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review