Unravelling intravertebral integration, modularity and disparity in Felidae (Mammalia)
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Morphological integration and modularity, which describe the relationships among morphological attributes and reflect genetic, developmental, and functional interactions, have been hypothesized to be major influences on trait responses to selection and thus morphological evolution. The mammalian presacral vertebral column shows little variation in vertebral count and therefore specialization for function occurs primarily through modification of vertebral shape. However, vertebral shape has been suggested to be under strong control from developmental canalization, although this has never been explicitly tested. Here, we assess hypotheses of developmental modules in the vertebrae of felids to determine whether developmental interactions are a primary influence on vertebral modularity. Additionally, we analyze the magnitudes of both intravertebral integration and disparity to evaluate if level of integration varies along the vertebral column and, if so, whether integration and disparity are associated. Our results confirm the hypothesis of vertebral developmental modularity, with most presacral vertebrae displaying two modules. Exceptions are concentrated in the boundaries among traditional and functional regions, suggesting that intravertebral modularity may reflect larger‐scale modularity of the felid vertebral column. We further demonstrate that overall integration and disparity are highest in posterior vertebrae, thus providing an empirical example of integration potentially promoting greater morphological responses to selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pattern of high integration associated with low evolutionary rates and low disparity may not represent a general property of phenotypic integration, as the strength of within-module correlation is positively correlated with disparity in other systems.
“However, this pattern may not represent a general property of phenotypic integration as the strength of within-module correlation is positively correlated with disparity in other systems (16).”
From Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
The macroevolutionary consequences of phenotypic integration: from development to deep time
Goswami, A., Smaers, J. B., Soligo, C., & Polly, P. D. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0254 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationCranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution
Goswami, A. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/505758 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Influence of Modularity on Cranial Morphological Disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia)
Goswami, A., & Polly, P. D. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009517 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium
Felice, R. N., & Goswami, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716437115 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
“promoting greater response to selection (16).”
ResultSelf-citation
- Authors
- Randau, M., & Goswami, A.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Randau, Marcela
- Venue
- Evolution & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-17
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-95
- ISSN
- 1520-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1525-142X
- OpenAlex
- W2615000196
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Evolution & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- SYNTHESYS Project
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- morphological integration, modularity, disparity, Felidae, spine, presacral vertebrae, vertebral shape, developmental canalization, developmental modules, morphological evolution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Mammals, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Spine, Felidae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review