Clinical benefits and impact of early use of long‐acting injectable antipsychotics for schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Aim: Results from clinical trials support the use of oral antipsychotics for treatment of early or first‐episode psychosis in patients with schizophrenia. This paper will review literature on the advantages of early initiation of treatment for schizophrenia and the clinical benefits of early use of long‐acting injectable antipsychotics ( LAIs ). Method: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify published literature on the use of LAIs early in the treatment of schizophrenia. Results: Although there is a higher response rate to initial antipsychotic treatment for a first‐episode of schizophrenia than with subsequent antipsychotic treatment, we have not effectively addressed this issue. Poor adherence to treatment is a primary cause of relapse and rehospitalization in subsequent years and was associated with higher relapse rates resulting in devastating effects and substantial economic burden. The costs of nonadherence were estimated to be $1.48 billion. Thus, a major challenge with the treatment of schizophrenia is changing poor adherence to persistence with antipsychotic therapy. LAIs are known to be at least as effective as oral antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia, and yet are underutilized. Further, LAIs address many of the problems associated with adherence to oral therapy. Recent evidence suggests that LAIs are effective for treating first‐episode psychosis and for early initiation of treatment for schizophrenia. Conclusion: Although consistent antipsychotic treatment represents a critical part of treatment, a person‐centred approach to treating schizophrenia is essential for all aspects of care, including establishing and maintaining a therapeutic alliance, strengthening shared decision‐making and adherence, and achieving long‐lasting recovery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, adherence to pharmacological treatments is frequently far from optimal.
“These latter aspects related to adherence are especially relevant in the setting of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, where adherence to pharmacological treatments is frequently far from optimal and represents the main cause of relapse [16–18] and hospitalizations [19, 20].”
From The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: A clinical review (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
In schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, poor adherence to pharmacological treatments is the main cause of relapse and hospitalizations.
“These latter aspects related to adherence are especially relevant in the setting of schizophrenia and psychotic disorders, where adherence to pharmacological treatments is frequently far from optimal and represents the main cause of relapse [16–18] and hospitalizations [19, 20].”
From The role of shared decision-making in improving adherence to pharmacological treatments in patients with schizophrenia: A clinical review (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Stevens, G. L., Dawson, G., & Zummo, J.
- Affiliations
- Partners in Aging & Long‐Term Caregiving Washington District of Columbia USA
- Wholeness Center Fort Collins Colorado USA
- Alkermes (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stevens, Georgia L.
- ORCID
- Zummo, Jacqueline
- Venue
- Early Intervention in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-09-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 365-377
- ISSN
- 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-7893
- PMC
- PMC5054869
- OpenAlex
- W2100554603
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- long-acting injectable antipsychotics, schizophrenia, early treatment initiation, first-episode psychosis, antipsychotic adherence, treatment persistence, shared decision-making, therapeutic relationship, person-centred care
- MeSH terms
- Delayed-Action Preparations, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Medication Adherence, Early Medical Intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review