Biological bases of suicidal behaviours: a narrative review
Abstract
Suicidal behaviour is a multifaceted phenomenon that concerns all human populations. It has been suggested that a complex interaction between the individual genetic profile and environmental factors throughout life underlies the pathophysiology of suicidal behaviour. Although epidemiological and genetic studies suggest the existence of a genetic component, exposure to biological and psychosocial adversities, especially during critical developmental periods, also contributes to altering the biological responses to threat and pleasure. This results in amplified maladaptive cognitive and behavioural traits and states associated with suicidal behaviours. Alterations in the cognitive inhibition and decision‐making capacity have been implicated in suicidal behaviours. Structural and functional changes in key brain regions and networks, such as prefrontal cortex, insula and default mode network, may underlie this relationship. Furthermore, the shift from health to suicidal behaviour incorporates complex and dynamic changes in the immune and stress responses, monoaminergic system, gonadal system and neuroplasticity. In this review, we describe the major findings of epidemiological, genetic, neuroanatomical, neuropsychological, immunological and neuroendocrinological studies on suicide behaviours to provide a solid background for future research in this field. This broad overview of the biological bases of suicide should promote neuroscience research on suicidal behaviours. This might lead to improved biological models and to the identification of evidence‐based biomarkers, treatment options and preventive strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gaps in understanding biological mechanisms of suicide contribute to suboptimal prevention outcomes and limited long-term interventions.
“As highlighted recently, gaps in understanding these processes contribute to suboptimal prevention outcomes and limited long-term interventions (9).”
From Exploring the neurobiological markers of suicidal behaviors in pediatric population: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 201 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Lengvenyte, A., Conejero, I., Courtet, P., & Olié, E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Psychiatry & Acute Care CHU Montpellier University of Montpellier Montpellier France
- Neuropsychiatry: Epidemiological and Clinical Research Inserm Unit 1061 Montpellier France
- Inserm (FR)
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12-16
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 330-351
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2993852823
- Semantic Scholar
- d280d99bf63506b6b698c65753306391739db5dc
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 201
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Montpellier
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- suicidal behavior, suicide, genetic susceptibility, gene-environment interaction, psychosocial adversity, developmental adversity, cognitive inhibition, decision-making, prefrontal cortex, insula, default mode network, immune response, stress response, monoaminergic systems, neuroplasticity, biomarkers, suicide prevention
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Risk Factors, Suicide, Prefrontal Cortex, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review