Cited by 66Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy metals in environmentCoal and Its By-products

Effect of organic matter on arsenic(V) and antimony(V) adsorption in soils

Dousova, B., Buzek, F., Herzogova, L., Machovic, V., Lhotka, M.·2015·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary: The interaction of toxic oxyanions with organic matter can affect their stability and binding mechanisms in soils. The adsorption/desorption properties of arsenic ( As V )/antimony ( Sb V ) oxyanions were tested with two types of soil with a variable content of natural organic matter ( NOM ). Sample JEZ (I) represented a locality near a brown‐coal power plant, and therefore formerly exposed to large amounts of atmospheric pollution, while sample LIZ ( II ) originated in an uncontaminated region without anthropogenic impact. Soil samples were investigated from the organic O and mineral B horizons. Different As / Sb fixations were indicated by their different adsorption affinity to O and B horizons. Arsenic as As V was strongly adsorbed in B horizons, while antimony as Sb V was predominantly bound in O horizons. The sorption followed the Langmuir model with maximum adsorption capacities of 1.4 × 10 −2 mmol g −1 for As and 1.0 × 10 −2 mmol g −1 for Sb adsorptions. The release of As and Sb to distilled water and 0.1 m KCl illustrated the significantly larger stability of As and Sb oxyanions in ionic solutions, where available ions prevented the aggregation of organic matter, thus maintaining the balanced distribution of surface charge. Distilled water with a pH of about 6 supported a negative surface charge density and enhanced the release of As / Sb oxyanions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ejss.12206

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to Sharma et al. and Mitsunobu et al., a similar mechanism with much greater affinity to organic matter could be expected with Sb.

    “According to Sharma et al. [16, 17] and Mitsunobu et al. [18], a similar mechanism with much greater affinity to organic matter could be expected with Sb [19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dousova, B., Buzek, F., Herzogova, L., Machovic, V., & Lhotka, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Chemical Technology Prague Technicka 5 166 28 Prague 6 Czech Republic
  • Czech Geological Survey Geologicka 6 152 00 Prague 5 Czech Republic
  • University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague (CZ)
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-23
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
74-82
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W1564077081
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grant Agency of Czech Republic (P210/10/0938)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
arsenic(V) adsorption, natural organic matter, soil organic matter, Langmuir isotherm, soil horizons, desorption, surface charge, pH effect, heavy metal mobility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review