The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LUCAS Soil, the largest expandable soil dataset for Europe: a review
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Soil is a non‐renewable resource that requires constant monitoring to prevent its degradation and promote its sustainable management. The ‘Land Use/Cover Area frame statistical Survey Soil’ (LUCAS Soil) is an extensive and regular topsoil survey that is carried out across the European Union to derive policy‐relevant statistics on the effect of land management on soil characteristics. Approximately 45 000 soil samples have been collected from two time‐periods, 2009–2012 and 2015. A new sampling series will be undertaken in 2018, with new measurements included. The organization for the 2018 sampling campaign represents an opportunity to summarize past LUCAS Soil achievements and present its future objectives. In 2009–2012 and 2015, LUCAS Soil surveys targeted physicochemical properties, including pH, organic carbon, nutrient concentrations and cation exchange capacity. Data from 2009–2012 (ca. 22 000 points) and derived output (more than 20 maps) are available freely from the European Soil Data Centre website. Analyses of samples collected during 2015 are ongoing and data will be available at the end of 2017. In the 2018 LUCAS Soil sampling campaign, additional properties, including bulk density, soil biodiversity, specific measurements for organic‐rich soil and soil erosion will be measured. Here we present the current dataset (LUCAS Soil 2009–2012 and 2015), its potential for reuse and future development plans (LUCAS Soil 2018 and over). LUCAS Soil represents the largest harmonized open‐access dataset of topsoil properties available for the European Union at the global scale. It was developed as an expandable resource, with the possibility to add new properties and sampling locations during successive sampling campaigns. Data are available to the scientific community and decision makers, thus contributing to both research and the development of the land‐focused policy agenda. Highlights: LUCAS Soil consists of soil physicochemical and biological properties data from Europe. Harmonized and open‐access dataset allowing inclusion of soil in large‐scale inter‐disciplinary assessments. LUCAS Soil has a broad pool of users from scientists to policy makers, and applications from map validation to modelling. LUCAS Soil confirms the need for open‐access and a large‐scale dataset for soil properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning
Bardgett, R. D., & van der Putten, W. H. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13855 · Cited by 3,990
Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis
Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x · Cited by 3,972
Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., et al. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5201.1117 · Cited by 2,861
Soil compaction in cropping systems
Hamza, M. A., & Anderson, W. K. (2005) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009 · Cited by 1,889
Heavy Metals in Agricultural Soils of the European Union with Implications for Food Safety
Tóth, G., Hermann, T., Da Silva, M. R., & Montanarella, L. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.017 · Cited by 1,654
Keesstra, S. D., Bouma, J., Wallinga, J., Tittonell, P., Smith, P., Cerdà, A., Montanarella, L., Quinton, J. N., Pachepsky, Y., van der Putten, W. H., et al. (2016) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-2-111-2016 · Cited by 1,560
Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming
Crowther, T. W., Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Rowe, C. W., Wieder, W. R., Carey, J. C., Machmuller, M. B., Snoek, B. L., Fang, S., Zhou, G., Allison, S. D., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20150 · Cited by 1,397
The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review
Salter, A. J., & Martin, B. R. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00091-3 · Cited by 1,358
The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe
Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Poesen, J., Ballabio, C., Lugato, E., Meusburger, K., Montanarella, L., & Alewell, C. (2015) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.012 · Cited by 1,335
Self-citationEttema, C. (2002) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(02)02496-5 · Cited by 1,320
Cited by
Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils – a hidden reality unfolded
Silva, V., Mol, H. G. J., Zomer, P., Tienstra, M., Ritsema, C. J., & Geissen, V. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.441 · Cited by 1,153
Using the USLE: Chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling
Alewell, C., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., & Panagos, P. (2019) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004 · Cited by 804
Self-citationTopsoil organic matter build‐up in glacier forelands around the world
Khedim, N., Cécillon, L., Poulenard, J., Barré, P., Baudin, F., Marta, S., Rabatel, A., Dentant, C., Cauvy‐Fraunié, S., Anthelme, F., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15496 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Orgiazzi, A., Ballabio, C., Panagos, P., Jones, A., & Fernández‐Ugalde, O.
- Venue
- European Journal of Soil Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-23
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 140-153
- ISSN
- 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2389
- OpenAlex
- W2768533279
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LUCAS Soil, the largest expandable soil dataset for Europe: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ejss.12499
- The paper
- Orgiazzi, A., Ballabio, C., Panagos, P., Jones, A., & Fernández‐Ugalde, O. (2018). LUCAS Soil, the largest expandable soil dataset for Europe: a review. European Journal of Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.