The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Widespread evidence for incipient ecological speciation: a meta‐analysis of isolation‐by‐ecology
Abstract
Ecologically mediated selection has increasingly become recognised as an important driver of speciation. The correlation between neutral genetic differentiation and environmental or phenotypic divergence among populations, to which we collectively refer to as isolation‐by‐ecology (IBE), is an indicator of ecological speciation. In a meta‐analysis framework, we determined the strength and commonality of IBE in nature. On the basis of 106 studies, we calculated a mean effect size of IBE with and without controlling for spatial autocorrelation among populations. Effect sizes were 0.34 (95%CI 0.24–0.42) and 0.26 (95%CI 0.13–0.37), respectively, indicating that an average of 5% of the neutral genetic differentiation among populations was explained purely by ecological contrast. Importantly, spatial autocorrelation reduced IBE correlations for environmental variables, but not for phenotypes. Through simulation, we showed how the influence of isolation‐by‐distance and spatial autocorrelation of ecological variables can result in false positives or underestimated correlations if not accounted for in the IBE model. Collectively, this meta‐analysis showed that ecologically induced genetic divergence is pervasive across time‐scales and taxa, and largely independent of the choice of molecular marker. We discuss the importance of these results in the context of adaptation and ecological speciation and suggest future research avenues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Bierne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., et al. (2013) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x · Cited by 2,194
Self-citationA Meta-Analysis of Local Adaptation in Plants
Leimu, R., & Fischer, M. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004010 · Cited by 1,155
Wu, C.-I., & Ting, C.-T. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1269 · Cited by 532
QST–FST comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity
Leinonen, T., McCairns, R. J. S., O'Hara, R. B., & Merilä, J. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3395 · Cited by 422 · cited 2×
“Traditionally, comparisons between divergence of ecologically relevant quantitative traits (QST) and neutral genetic differentiation (FST) have been used to detect selection and local adaptation (McKay & Latta 2002; Leinonen et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMethodSuppressor Variables in Path Models: Definitions and Interpretations
MAASSEN, G. H., & BAKKER, A. B. (2001) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124101030002004 · Cited by 407
Cited by
Grossenbacher, D. L., Veloz, S. D., & Sexton, J. P. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12355 · Cited by 112
Papadopulos, A. S. T., Kaye, M., Devaux, C., Hipperson, H., Lighten, J., Dunning, L. T., Hutton, I., Baker, W. J., Butlin, R. K., & Savolainen, V. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0342 · Cited by 47
Caputo, B., Nwakanma, D., Caputo, F. P., Jawara, M., Oriero, E. C., Hamid‐Adiamoh, M., Dia, I., Konate, L., Petrarca, V., Pinto, J., et al. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12866 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Shafer, A. B. A., & Wolf, J. B. W.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 940-950
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2041499885
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Widespread evidence for incipient ecological speciation: a meta‐analysis of isolation‐by‐ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12120
- The paper
- Shafer, A. B. A., & Wolf, J. B. W. (2013). Widespread evidence for incipient ecological speciation: a meta‐analysis of isolation‐by‐ecology. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.