The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Body masses, functional responses and predator–prey stability
Abstract
The stability of ecological communities depends strongly on quantitative characteristics of population interactions (type‐II vs. type‐III functional responses) and the distribution of body masses across species. Until now, these two aspects have almost exclusively been treated separately leaving a substantial gap in our general understanding of food webs. We analysed a large data set of arthropod feeding rates and found that all functional‐response parameters depend on the body masses of predator and prey. Thus, we propose generalised functional responses which predict gradual shifts from type‐II predation of small predators on equally sized prey to type‐III functional‐responses of large predators on small prey. Models including these generalised functional responses predict population dynamics and persistence only depending on predator and prey body masses, and we show that these predictions are strongly supported by empirical data on forest soil food webs. These results help unravelling systematic relationships between quantitative population interactions and large‐scale community patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Ecological models and data in R
Bolker, B. M. (2008) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4g37 · Cited by 1,297 · cited 1×
“Fitting the models to the data set of experimental observations by nonlinear least squares methods requires integrating the functional response to predict Ne, the number of prey individuals eaten during the experimental time as a function of the initial prey density (‘nls’ in R; Bolker 2008; R Development Core Team 20…”
MethodFischer, M., Bossdorf, O., Gockel, S., Hänsel, F., Hemp, A., Hessenmöller, D., Korte, G., Nieschulze, J., Pfeiffer, S., Prati, D., et al. (2010) · Basic and Applied Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009 · Cited by 849
Cited by
Self-regulation and the stability of large ecological networks
Barabás, G., Michalska-Smith, M. J., & Allesina, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0357-6 · Cited by 138
Eco-Evolutionary Origins of Diverse Abundance, Biomass, and Trophic Structures in Food Webs
Gibert, J. P., & Yeakel, J. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00015 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalinkat, G., Schneider, F. D., Digel, C., Guill, C., Rall, B. C., & Brose, U.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-07-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1126-1134
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2158406456
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body masses, functional responses and predator–prey stability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12147
- The paper
- Kalinkat, G., Schneider, F. D., Digel, C., Guill, C., Rall, B. C., & Brose, U. (2013). Body masses, functional responses and predator–prey stability. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.