Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animals

Stevens, Virginie M., Whitmee, Sarah, Le Galliard, Jean‐François, Clobert, Jean, Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin, Bonte, Dries, Brändle, Martin, Matthias Dehling, D., Hof, Christian, Trochet, Audrey, Baguette, Michel·2014·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Dispersal, the behaviour ensuring gene flow, tends to covary with a number of morphological, ecological and behavioural traits. While species‐specific dispersal behaviours are the product of each species’ unique evolutionary history, there may be distinct interspecific patterns of covariation between dispersal and other traits (‘dispersal syndromes’) due to their shared evolutionary history or shared environments. Using dispersal, phylogeny and trait data for 15 terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animal Orders (> 700 species), we tested for the existence and consistency of dispersal syndromes across species. At this taxonomic scale, dispersal increased linearly with body size in omnivores, but decreased above a critical length in herbivores and carnivores. Species life history and ecology significantly influenced patterns of covariation, with higher phylogenetic signal of dispersal in aerial dispersers compared with ground dwellers and stronger evidence for dispersal syndromes in aerial dispersers and ectotherms, compared with ground dwellers and endotherms. Our results highlight the complex role of dispersal in the evolution of species life‐history strategies: good dispersal ability was consistently associated with high fecundity and survival, and in aerial dispersers it was associated with early maturation. We discuss the consequences of these findings for species evolution and range shifts in response to future climate change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ele.12303

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Metadata

Authors
Stevens, V. M., Whitmee, S., Le Galliard, J., Clobert, J., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Bonte, D., Brändle, M., Matthias Dehling, D., Hof, C., Trochet, A., & Baguette, M.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-10
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
1039-1052
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W2066965189
Cited by
250
References
5
FWCI
19.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12303
The paper
Stevens, V. M., Whitmee, S., Le Galliard, J., Clobert, J., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Bonte, D., Brändle, M., Matthias Dehling, D., Hof, C., Trochet, A., & Baguette, M. (2014). A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animals. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.