The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animals
Abstract
Dispersal, the behaviour ensuring gene flow, tends to covary with a number of morphological, ecological and behavioural traits. While species‐specific dispersal behaviours are the product of each species’ unique evolutionary history, there may be distinct interspecific patterns of covariation between dispersal and other traits (‘dispersal syndromes’) due to their shared evolutionary history or shared environments. Using dispersal, phylogeny and trait data for 15 terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animal Orders (> 700 species), we tested for the existence and consistency of dispersal syndromes across species. At this taxonomic scale, dispersal increased linearly with body size in omnivores, but decreased above a critical length in herbivores and carnivores. Species life history and ecology significantly influenced patterns of covariation, with higher phylogenetic signal of dispersal in aerial dispersers compared with ground dwellers and stronger evidence for dispersal syndromes in aerial dispersers and ectotherms, compared with ground dwellers and endotherms. Our results highlight the complex role of dispersal in the evolution of species life‐history strategies: good dispersal ability was consistently associated with high fecundity and survival, and in aerial dispersers it was associated with early maturation. We discuss the consequences of these findings for species evolution and range shifts in response to future climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Bartoń, K. (2010) · CRAN: Contributed Packages · doi:10.32614/cran.package.mumin · Cited by 4,829
Life-History Tactics: A Review of the Ideas
Stearns, S. C. (1976) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/409052 · Cited by 3,557
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size
Marden, J. H. (1994) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.4.r1077 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Debecker, S., & Stoks, R. (2019) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1002/ecm.1332 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, V. M., Whitmee, S., Le Galliard, J., Clobert, J., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Bonte, D., Brändle, M., Matthias Dehling, D., Hof, C., Trochet, A., & Baguette, M.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-10
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1039-1052
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2066965189
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12303
- The paper
- Stevens, V. M., Whitmee, S., Le Galliard, J., Clobert, J., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Bonte, D., Brändle, M., Matthias Dehling, D., Hof, C., Trochet, A., & Baguette, M. (2014). A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi‐terrestrial animals. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.