The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change
Abstract
How soil processes such as carbon cycling will respond to future climate change depends on the responses of complex microbial communities, but most ecosystem models assume that microbial functional responses are resilient and can be predicted from simple parameters such as biomass and temperature. Here, we consider how historical contingencies might alter those responses because function depends on prior conditions or biota. Functional resilience can be driven by physiological, community or adaptive shifts; historical contingencies can result from the influence of historical environments or a combination of priority effects and biotic resistance. By modelling microbial population responses to environmental change, we demonstrate that historical environments can constrain soil function with the degree of constraint depending on the magnitude of change in the context of the prior environment. For example microbial assemblages from more constant environments were more sensitive to change leading to poorer functional acclimatisation compared to microbial assemblages from more fluctuating environments. Such historical contingencies can lead to deviations from expected functional responses to climate change as well as local variability in those responses. Our results form a set of interrelated hypotheses regarding soil microbial responses to climate change that warrant future empirical attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Connell, J. H. (1978) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.199.4335.1302 · Cited by 9,417
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645
Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities
Allison, S. D., & Martiny, J. B. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801925105 · Cited by 3,151
Hutchinson, G. E. (1961) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282171 · Cited by 3,074
Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy
Lennon, J. T., & Jones, S. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2504 · Cited by 1,883
Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle
Schlesinger, W. H., & Andrews, J. A. (2000) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1006247623877 · Cited by 1,773
Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology
Allison, S. D., Wallenstein, M. D., & Bradford, M. A. (2010) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo846 · Cited by 1,562
Schimel, J. (2003) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(03)00015-4 · Cited by 1,552
Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: a model
Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. B., & Cole, C. V. (1988) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf02180320 · Cited by 1,453
Global patterns in belowground communities
Fierer, N., Strickland, M. S., Liptzin, D., Bradford, M. A., & Cleveland, C. C. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01360.x · Cited by 1,218
Cited by
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
Life and death in the soil microbiome: how ecological processes influence biogeochemistry
Sokol, N. W., Slessarev, E., Marschmann, G. L., Nicolas, A., Blazewicz, S. J., Brodie, E. L., Firestone, M. K., Foley, M. M., Hestrin, R., Hungate, B. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00695-z · Cited by 1,179
Microbial Community Resilience across Ecosystems and Multiple Disturbances
Philippot, L., Griffiths, B. S., & Langenheder, S. (2021) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00026-20 · Cited by 562
Legacy effects of drought on plant–soil feedbacks and plant–plant interactions
Kaisermann, A., de Vries, F. T., Griffiths, R. I., & Bardgett, R. D. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14661 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkes, C. V., & Keitt, T. H.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 612-625
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W1950497459
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 32.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/ele.12451
- The paper
- Hawkes, C. V., & Keitt, T. H. (2015). Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.