Cited by 10Higher Education Research StudiesMedical Education and AdmissionsMultilingual Education and Policy

Differential Prediction in the Use of the SAT and High School Grades in Predicting College Performance: Joint Effects of Race and Language

Shewach, Oren R., Shen, Winny, Sackett, Paul R., Kuncel, Nathan R.·2017·Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice

Abstract

The literature on differential prediction of college performance of racial/ethnic minority students for standardized tests and high school grades indicates the use of these predictors often results in overprediction of minority student performance. However, these studies typically involve native English‐speaking students. In contrast, a smaller literature on language proficiency suggests academic performance of those with more limited English language proficiency may be underpredicted by standardized tests. These two literatures have not been well integrated, despite the fact that a number of racial/ethnic minority groups within the United States contain recent immigrant populations or heritage language speakers. This study investigates the joint role of race/ethnicity and language proficiency in Hispanic, Asian, and White ethnic groups across three educational admissions systems (SAT, HSGPA, and their composite) in predicting freshman grades. Our results indicate that language may differentially affect academic outcomes for different racial/ethnic subgroups. The SAT loses predictive power for Asian and White students who speak another best language, whereas it does not for Hispanic students who speak another best language. The differential prediction of college grades of linguistic minorities within racial/ethnic minority subgroups appears to be driven by the verbally loaded subtests of standardized tests but is largely unrelated to quantitative tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/emip.12150

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shewach, O. R., Shen, W., Sackett, P. R., & Kuncel, N. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Shewach, Oren R.
  • Shen, Winny
  • Sackett, Paul R.
  • Kuncel, Nathan R.
Venue
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-18
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
46-57
ISSN
  • 0731-1745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3992
OpenAlex
W2615786270
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Measurement Issues and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The College Board
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
differential prediction, SAT, high school grades, university performance, race and ethnicity, language proficiency, Hispanic students, Asian students, white students, verbal subtests, university admission, heritage speakers, immigrant students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review