Cited by 59Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes

The role of pre‐morbid diabetes on developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

D'Ovidio, F., d'Errico, A., Carnà, P., Calvo, A., Costa, G., Chiò, A.·2018·European Journal of Neurology

Abstract

Background and purpose: The literature on the association between diabetes and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) consists of a limited number of studies. This cohort study was developed in order to assess the role of diabetes on the risk of developing ALS. Methods: The study population was represented by all residents in Turin (Italy) at the beginning of 1996 who participated in the 1991 census, over 14 years of age (n = 727 977) and followed up for ALS occurrence from 1998 to 2014. Presence of diabetes at baseline or during follow‐up was ascertained through two Piedmont regional sources: the Diabetes Registry and the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Drug Prescription Archive. The risk of ALS was estimated using the Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta ALS Registry (PARALS). The association of diabetes, treated as a time‐dependent variable, with ALS onset was estimated through Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for age, gender, education and marital status. Results: During follow‐up, 397 subjects developed ALS, 24 of whom were already diabetic before ALS onset. Diabetes was associated with a significantly decreased risk of ALS [hazard ratio, 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.45)] without differences in risk by gender, age class or ALS phenotype. Conclusion: The results support the protective role of diabetes toward ALS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ene.13465

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 24 · Cited by 59

Authors
D'Ovidio, F., d'Errico, A., Carnà, P., Calvo, A., Costa, G., & Chiò, A.
Affiliations
  • ‘Rita Levi Montalcini’ Department of Neurosciences University of Turin Turin
  • Epidemiology Department ASL TO3 – Piedmont Region Grugliasco, Turin Italy
  • Regione Piemonte (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Venue
European Journal of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-21
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
164-170
ISSN
  • 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1331
OpenAlex
W2754373622
Cited by
59
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondazione Vialli e Mauro per la ricerca e lo sport onlus
  • Associazione Io corro con Giovanni
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, ALS risk, ALS phenotypes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Risk, Cohort Studies, Marital Status, Age of Onset, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review