The role of pre‐morbid diabetes on developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Abstract
Background and purpose: The literature on the association between diabetes and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) consists of a limited number of studies. This cohort study was developed in order to assess the role of diabetes on the risk of developing ALS. Methods: The study population was represented by all residents in Turin (Italy) at the beginning of 1996 who participated in the 1991 census, over 14 years of age (n = 727 977) and followed up for ALS occurrence from 1998 to 2014. Presence of diabetes at baseline or during follow‐up was ascertained through two Piedmont regional sources: the Diabetes Registry and the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Drug Prescription Archive. The risk of ALS was estimated using the Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta ALS Registry (PARALS). The association of diabetes, treated as a time‐dependent variable, with ALS onset was estimated through Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for age, gender, education and marital status. Results: During follow‐up, 397 subjects developed ALS, 24 of whom were already diabetic before ALS onset. Diabetes was associated with a significantly decreased risk of ALS [hazard ratio, 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.45)] without differences in risk by gender, age class or ALS phenotype. Conclusion: The results support the protective role of diabetes toward ALS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research shows a protective role of type 2 diabetes in the risk of ALS.
“We found an inverse association between a history of diabetes mellitus and ALS risk, which is in line with previous research showing a protective role of type 2 diabetes in the risk of ALS [38–40].”
From Lifestyle and medical conditions in relation to ALS risk and progression—an introduction to the Swedish ALSrisc Study (2024) · cites this paper as [40]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- D'Ovidio, F., d'Errico, A., Carnà, P., Calvo, A., Costa, G., & Chiò, A.
- Affiliations
- ‘Rita Levi Montalcini’ Department of Neurosciences University of Turin Turin
- Epidemiology Department ASL TO3 – Piedmont Region Grugliasco, Turin Italy
- Regione Piemonte (IT)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-21
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-170
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- OpenAlex
- W2754373622
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fondazione Vialli e Mauro per la ricerca e lo sport onlus
- Associazione Io corro con Giovanni
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
- Keywords
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, ALS risk, ALS phenotypes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Risk, Cohort Studies, Marital Status, Age of Onset, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review