Long‐Term Disease Control Following Completion of Cladribine Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis: Extended Follow‐Up of the CladStop Cohort
Open accessAbstract
Background: Long‐term disease control after the standard two‐year cladribine course in multiple sclerosis (MS) remains insufficiently characterized in real‐world settings. We evaluated disease control, treatment re‐initiation, and safety during extended follow‐up of the multicenter CladStop cohort after treatment completion. Methods: We included 204 patients with relapsing MS who completed the approved two‐year cladribine regimen and had ≥ 6 months of follow‐up after treatment completion. Time zero (“CladStop”) was defined as 24 months after first cladribine dosing. Co‐primary endpoints were time to loss of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA‐3) and annualized relapse rate (ARR) after CladStop. Kaplan–Meier analyses, multivariable Cox models, and mixed‐effects Poisson regression were applied. Results: Mean follow‐up after CladStop was 44.2 ± 8.6 months. Overall, 81/204 patients (39.7%) lost NEDA‐3. NEDA‐3 survival was 82.8% (95% CI 77.8–88.2) at 12 months, 69.6% (95% CI 63.6–76.2) at 24 months, and 56.4% (95% CI 49.2–64.8) at 48 months. Forty‐two patients (20.6%) relapsed, with an overall ARR of 0.06 (95% CI 0.04–0.08). Relapse rates decreased over time (rate ratio/year 0.74, 95% CI 0.55–0.999; p = 0.044). MRI activity occurred in 29.9% of patients and 6‐month confirmed disability progression in 7.4%. A new DMT was initiated in 40.7% of patients. Relapses during treatment predicted earlier DMT initiation. Conclusions: Disease control remained durable in many patients after completion of cladribine treatment. However, over 40% initiated subsequent DMT during follow‐up, indicating that prolonged treatment‐free remission is not universal. Disease reactivation was driven mainly by inflammatory activity rather than disability worsening.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19
- Authors
- Schiavetti, I., Signori, A., Albanese, A., Frau, J., Cocco, E., Lorefice, L., di Lemme, S., Fantozzi, R., Centonze, D., Landi, D., Marfia, G., Signoriello, E., Lus, G., Zecca, C., Gobbi, C., Iodice, R., Malimpensa, L., Cordioli, C., Ferraro, D., Ruscica, F., Pasquali, L., Repice, A., Immovilli, P., Ferrò, M. T., Bonavita, S., Di Filippo, M., Abbadessa, G., Govone, F., Sormani, M. P., & CladStop Study Group
- Affiliations
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana (IT)
- University of Genoa (IT)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla Ospedale Binaghi Cagliari Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Cagliari Cagliari Italy
- Unit of Neurology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Neuromed Pozzilli Italy
- Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (IT)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
- University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
- Federico II University Hospital (IT)
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
- Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT)
- Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù (IT)
- University of Pisa (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
- Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital (IT)
- Neurological Unit, Cerebrovascular Department, Neuroimmunology Center for Multiple Sclerosis, ASST Crema Crema Italy
- Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Università di Perugia Perugia Italy
- Centro Sclerosi Multipla‐Neurologia di Mondovì Cuneo Italy
- Corresponding author
- Schiavetti, Irene
- ORCID
- Schiavetti, Irene
- Signori, Alessio
- Albanese, Angela
- Frau, Jessica
- Cocco, Eleonora
- Lorefice, Lorena
- Fantozzi, Roberta
- Centonze, Diego
- Landi, Doriana
- Marfia, Girolama
- Signoriello, Elisabetta
- Lus, Giacomo
- Zecca, Chiara
- Gobbi, Claudio
- Iodice, Rosa
- Malimpensa, Leonardo
- Cordioli, Cinzia
- Ferraro, Diana
- Pasquali, Livia
- Immovilli, Paolo
- Ferrò, Maria Teresa
- Bonavita, Simona
- Di Filippo, Massimiliano
- Abbadessa, Gianmarco
- Sormani, Maria Pia
- Venue
- European Journal of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-10-30
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1351-5101 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-1331
- PMC
- PMC13722574
- OpenAlex
- W7224861736
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, cladribine, long-term disease control, no evidence of disease activity, annualized relapse rate, disease reactivation, disability progression, MRI activity, disease-modifying therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Cladribine, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review