The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complications of epilepsy surgery—A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Purpose: Underutilization of epilepsy surgery remains a major problem and is in part due to physicians' misconceptions about the risks associated with epilepsy surgery. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on complications of focal epilepsy surgery. Methods: A literature search was conducted using P ub M ed and E mbase to identify studies examining epilepsy surgery complications. Abstract and full text review, along with data extraction, was done in duplicate. Minor medical and neurologic complications were defined as those that resolved completely within 3 months of surgery, whereas major complications persisted beyond that time frame. Descriptive statistics were used to report complication proportions. Key Findings: Invasive monitoring: Minor complications were reported in 7.7% of patients, whereas major complications were reported in only 0.6% of patients undergoing invasive monitoring. Resective surgery: Minor and major medical complications were reported in 5.1% and 1.5% of patients respectively, most common being cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Minor neurologic complications occurred in 10.9% of patients and were twice as frequent in children (11.2% vs. 5.5%). Minor visual field defects were most common (12.9%). Major neurologic complications were noted in 4.7% of patients, with the most common being major visual field defects (2.1% overall). Perioperative mortality was uncommon after epilepsy surgery, occurring in only 0.4% of temporal lobe patients (1.2%extratemporal). Significance: The majority of complications after epilepsy surgery are minor or temporary as they tend to resolve completely. Major permanent neurologic complications remain uncommon. Mortality as a result of epilepsy surgery in the modern era is rare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Surgery for Temporal-Lobe Epilepsy
Wiebe, S., Blume, W. T., Girvin, J. P., & Eliasziw, M. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200108023450501 · Cited by 3,525
Self-citationEarly Surgical Therapy for Drug-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Randomized Trial
Engel, J. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.220 · Cited by 1,230
Long-term seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Téllez-Zenteno, J. F., Dhar, R., & Wiebe, S. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh449 · Cited by 1,088
Self-citationEngel, J., Wiebe, S., French, J., Sperling, M., Williamson, P., Spencer, D., Gumnit, R., Zahn, C., Westbrook, E., & Enos, B. (2003) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.48202.x · Cited by 400
Self-citationReferral pattern for epilepsy surgery after evidence-based recommendations: A retrospective study
Haneef, Z., Stern, J., Dewar, S., & Engel, J. (2010) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181eee457 · Cited by 251
Complications of invasive subdural grid monitoring in children with epilepsy
Önal, Ç., Otsubo, H., Araki, T., Chitoku, S., Ochi, A., Weiss, S., Logan, W., Elliott, I., Snead, O. C., & Rutka, J. T. (2003) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.1017 · Cited by 196
Empirical evidence of underutilization of referrals for epilepsy surgery evaluation
de Flon, P., Kumlien, E., Reuterwall, C., & Mattsson, P. (2009) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02891.x · Cited by 130
Epilepsy surgery, delays and referral patterns—are all your epilepsy patients controlled?
Benbadis, S. R., Heriaud, L., Tatum, W. O., & Vale, F. Ĺ. (2003) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/s1059-1311(02)00320-5 · Cited by 122
A survey of neurologists’ views on epilepsy surgery and medically refractory epilepsy
Hakimi, A. S., Spanaki, M. V., Schuh, L. A., Smith, B. J., & Schultz, L. R. (2008) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.003 · Cited by 117
Patient attitudes about treatments for intractable epilepsy
Swarztrauber, K., Dewar, S. R., & Engel, J. (2003) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1525-5050(02)00687-x · Cited by 104
Cited by
Resective Epilepsy Surgery for Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: A Review
Jobst, B. C., & Cascino, G. D. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.17426 · Cited by 665
Mullin, J. P., Shriver, M., Alomar, S., Najm, I., Bulacio, J., Chauvel, P., & Gonzalez‐Martinez, J. (2016) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13298 · Cited by 434
Angrick, M., Ottenhoff, M. C., Diener, L., Ivucic, D., Ivucic, G., Goulis, S., Saal, J., Colon, A. J., Wagner, L., Krusienski, D. J., et al. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02578-0 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Hader, W. J., Tellez‐Zenteno, J., Metcalfe, A., Hernandez‐Ronquillo, L., Wiebe, S., Kwon, C., & Jette, N.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-03
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 840-847
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W1968288733
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications of epilepsy surgery—A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/epi.12161
- The paper
- Hader, W. J., Tellez‐Zenteno, J., Metcalfe, A., Hernandez‐Ronquillo, L., Wiebe, S., Kwon, C., & Jette, N. (2013). Complications of epilepsy surgery—A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.