Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complications of epilepsy surgery—A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring

Open access
Hader, Walter J., Tellez‐Zenteno, Jose, Metcalfe, Amy, Hernandez‐Ronquillo, Lisbeth, Wiebe, Samuel, Kwon, Churl‐Su, Jette, Nathalie·2013·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: Underutilization of epilepsy surgery remains a major problem and is in part due to physicians' misconceptions about the risks associated with epilepsy surgery. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on complications of focal epilepsy surgery. Methods: A literature search was conducted using P ub M ed and E mbase to identify studies examining epilepsy surgery complications. Abstract and full text review, along with data extraction, was done in duplicate. Minor medical and neurologic complications were defined as those that resolved completely within 3 months of surgery, whereas major complications persisted beyond that time frame. Descriptive statistics were used to report complication proportions. Key Findings: Invasive monitoring: Minor complications were reported in 7.7% of patients, whereas major complications were reported in only 0.6% of patients undergoing invasive monitoring. Resective surgery: Minor and major medical complications were reported in 5.1% and 1.5% of patients respectively, most common being cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Minor neurologic complications occurred in 10.9% of patients and were twice as frequent in children (11.2% vs. 5.5%). Minor visual field defects were most common (12.9%). Major neurologic complications were noted in 4.7% of patients, with the most common being major visual field defects (2.1% overall). Perioperative mortality was uncommon after epilepsy surgery, occurring in only 0.4% of temporal lobe patients (1.2%extratemporal). Significance: The majority of complications after epilepsy surgery are minor or temporary as they tend to resolve completely. Major permanent neurologic complications remain uncommon. Mortality as a result of epilepsy surgery in the modern era is rare.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.12161

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Hader, W. J., Tellez‐Zenteno, J., Metcalfe, A., Hernandez‐Ronquillo, L., Wiebe, S., Kwon, C., & Jette, N.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-03
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
840-847
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W1968288733
Cited by
297
References
12
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications of epilepsy surgery—A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/epi.12161
The paper
Hader, W. J., Tellez‐Zenteno, J., Metcalfe, A., Hernandez‐Ronquillo, L., Wiebe, S., Kwon, C., & Jette, N. (2013). Complications of epilepsy surgery—A systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12161

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.