The evolution of ontogenetic allometric trajectories in mammalian domestication
Open accessAbstract
Morphological divergence of domesticated as compared to wild forms must result from changes in the ontogenetic process. Species-specific tests for heterochrony have rejected a single explanation of domestic forms representing juveniles of their wild relatives. Ontogenetic allometric trajectories for 12 pairs of wild and domestic mammals were examined using skull growth data for 1070 specimens, including representatives from all lineages in which domestication has occurred. A suite of tests were performed to quantify allometric disparity in wild and domestic forms and assess the extent and patterning of modification to allometric trajectories. Domestication has modified postnatal ontogenetic allometric trajectories in mammals, and has generated disparity, achieved through lengthening of trajectory slopes and alteration to slope angles. Allometric disparity was similar for domestic forms compared to their wild relatives, whereas the magnitude of dispersion along allometric vectors differed between precocial mammals and altricial mammals, underscoring the importance of life history and shared evolutionary history in patterns of ontogenetic variation. The results verify the importance of scaling in the morphological changes associated with domestication. The response to domestication for all measured trajectory parameters was variable across species, suggesting multiple pathways of change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sánchez-Villagra et al. (2017) and Wilson (2018) found no single universal pattern of skull morphology changes in domestic animals.
“Sánchez-Villagra et al. (2017) looked in detail on skull morphology in pairs of wild and domestic animals and Wilson (2018) at developmental trajectories of skull morphology within domestic species. Neither found a single universal pattern.”
From The neural crest cell hypothesis: no unified explanation for domestication (2021) · cites this paper as Wilson (2018)
Cites
The delayed rise of present-day mammals
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R., Price, S. A., Vos, R. A., Gittleman, J. L., & Purvis, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05634 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
Vigne, J.-D. (2011) · Comptes Rendus Biologies · doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.009 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
The Evolution of the Human Head
Lieberman, D. E. (2011) · doi:10.4159/9780674059443 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Cranial modularity shifts during mammalian evolution
Goswami, A. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/505758 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Geiger, M., & Schneider, R. A. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160107 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Mechanisms that underlie co‐variation of the brain and face
Marcucio, R. S., Young, N. M., Hu, D., & Hallgrimsson, B. (2011) · genesis · doi:10.1002/dvg.20710 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neural crest cell hypothesis: no unified explanation for domestication
Johnsson, M., Henriksen, R., & Wright, D. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab097 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Sánchez-Villagra et al. (2017) looked in detail on skull morphology in pairs of wild and domestic animals and Wilson (2018) at developmental trajectories of skull morphology within domestic species.”
Background
- Authors
- Wilson, L. A. B.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Laura A. B.
- ORCID
- Wilson, Laura A. B.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-25
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 867-877
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2793666355
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DE150100862)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- domestication, ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, skull development, scaling, morphological evolution
- MeSH terms
- Domestication, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Biological Evolution, Mammals, Skull, Species Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review