Cited by 34Morphological variations and asymmetryEvolution and Paleontology StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

The evolution of ontogenetic allometric trajectories in mammalian domestication

Open access
Wilson, Laura A. B.·2018·Evolution

Abstract

Morphological divergence of domesticated as compared to wild forms must result from changes in the ontogenetic process. Species-specific tests for heterochrony have rejected a single explanation of domestic forms representing juveniles of their wild relatives. Ontogenetic allometric trajectories for 12 pairs of wild and domestic mammals were examined using skull growth data for 1070 specimens, including representatives from all lineages in which domestication has occurred. A suite of tests were performed to quantify allometric disparity in wild and domestic forms and assess the extent and patterning of modification to allometric trajectories. Domestication has modified postnatal ontogenetic allometric trajectories in mammals, and has generated disparity, achieved through lengthening of trajectory slopes and alteration to slope angles. Allometric disparity was similar for domestic forms compared to their wild relatives, whereas the magnitude of dispersion along allometric vectors differed between precocial mammals and altricial mammals, underscoring the importance of life history and shared evolutionary history in patterns of ontogenetic variation. The results verify the importance of scaling in the morphological changes associated with domestication. The response to domestication for all measured trajectory parameters was variable across species, suggesting multiple pathways of change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/evo.13464

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sánchez-Villagra et al. (2017) and Wilson (2018) found no single universal pattern of skull morphology changes in domestic animals.

    “Sánchez-Villagra et al. (2017) looked in detail on skull morphology in pairs of wild and domestic animals and Wilson (2018) at developmental trajectories of skull morphology within domestic species. Neither found a single universal pattern.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, L. A. B.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Laura A. B.
Venue
Evolution
Published
2018-03-25
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
867-877
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
OpenAlex
W2793666355
Cited by
34
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DE150100862)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
domestication, ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, skull development, scaling, morphological evolution
MeSH terms
Domestication, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Biological Evolution, Mammals, Skull, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review